首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Risk of Positive Sentinel Lymph Node After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Implications for Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction
Authors:Samiei  S  van Kaathoven  B N  Boersma  L  Granzier  R W Y  Siesling  S  Engelen  S M E  de Munck  L  van Kuijk  S M J  van der Hulst  R R J W  Lobbes  M B I  Smidt  M L  van Nijnatten  T J A
Institution:1.Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
;2.Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
;3.GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
;4.Department of Radiation Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (MAASTRO Clinic), Maastricht, The Netherlands
;5.Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands
;6.Department of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
;7.Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
;8.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
;
Abstract:Background

Residual axillary lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is the determining factor for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Preoperative identification of patients needing PMRT is essential to enable shared decision-making when choosing the optimal timing of breast reconstruction. We determined the risk of positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) after NST in clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer.

Methods

All cT1-3N0 patients treated with NST followed by mastectomy and SLNB between 2010 and 2016 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Rate of positive SLN for different breast cancer subtypes was determined. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine correlated clinicopathological variables with positive SLN.

Results

In total 788 patients were included, of whom 25.0% (197/788) had positive SLN. cT1-3N0 ER+HER2+, cT1-3N0 ER−HER2+ , and cT1-2N0 triple-negative patients had the lowest rate of positive SLN: 7.2–11.5%, 0–6.3%, and 2.9–6.2%, respectively. cT1-3N0 ER+HER2− and cT3N0 triple-negative patients had the highest rate of positive SLN: 23.8–41.7% and 30.4%, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis showed that cT2 (odds ratio OR] 1.93; 95% confidence interval CI] 1.01–3.96), cT3 (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.30–5.38), grade 3 (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21–0.91), and ER+HER2− subtype (OR 3.94; 95% CI 1.77–8.74) were correlated with positive SLN.

Conclusions

In cT1-3N0 ER+HER2+, cT1-3N0 ER−HER2+, and cT1-2N0 triple-negative patients treated with NST, immediate reconstruction can be considered an acceptable option due to low risk of positive SLN. In cT1-3N0 ER+HER2− and cT3N0 triple-negative patients treated with NST, risks and benefits of immediate reconstruction should be discussed with patients due to the relatively high risk of positive SLN.

Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号