首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Implante percutáneo de la válvula autoexpandible CoreValve en pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave y aorta de porcelana: seguimiento a medio plazo
Authors:Isaac Pascual  Pablo Avanzas  Antonio J Muñoz-García  Diego López-Otero  Manuel F Jimenez-Navarro  Belén Cid-Alvarez  Raquel del Valle  Juan H Alonso-Briales  Raimundo Ocaranza-Sanchez  Fernando Alfonso  José M Hernández  Ramiro Trillo-Nouche  César Morís
Institution:1. Sección de Hemodinámica y Cardiología Intervencionista, Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, España;2. Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, España;3. Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, España;4. Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España
Abstract:

Introduction and objectives

There is little information on the use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and porcelain aorta. The primary aim of this study was to analyze death from any cause after CoreValve® implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis, with and without porcelain aorta.

Methods

In this multicenter, observational prospective study, carried out in 3 hospitals, percutaneous aortic valves were implanted in 449 patients with severely calcified aortic stenosis. Of these, 36 (8%) met the criteria for porcelain aorta. The primary end-point was death from any cause at 2 years.

Results

Patients with porcelain aorta more frequently had extracardiac vascular disease (11 30.6%] vs 49 11.9%]; P=.002), prior coronary revascularization (15 41.7%] vs 98 23.7%]; P=.017), and dyslipidemia (26 72.2%] vs 186 45%]; P=.02). In these patients, there was greater use of general anesthesia (15 41.7%] vs 111 16.9%]; P=.058) and axillary access (9 25%] vs 34 8.2%]; P=.004). The success rate of the procedure (94.4 vs 97.3%; P=.28) and the incidence of complications (7 19.4%] vs 48 11.6%]; P=.20) were similar in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary end point at 24 months of follow-up (8 22.2%] vs 66 16%]; P=.33). The only predictive variable for the primary end point was the presence of complications during implantation (hazard ratio=2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.5; P=.001).

Conclusions

In patients with aortic stenosis and porcelain aorta unsuitable for surgery, percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve® self-expanding valve prosthesis is safe and feasible.Full English text available from: www.revespcardiol.org/en
Keywords:AoP  aorta de porcelana  TAVI  implante transcaté  ter de pró  tesis valvular aó  rtica
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号