首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Efficacy of Split Schedule Versus Conventional Schedule Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Authors:Chelsea K. Osterman  Dilip S. Babu  Daniel M. Geynisman  Bianca Lewis  Robert A. Somer  Arjun V. Balar  Matthew R. Zibelman  Elizabeth A. Guancial  Gianna Antinori  Shun Yu  Vivek Narayan  Thomas J. Guzzo  Elizabeth R. Plimack  David J. Vaughn  Chunkit Fung  Ronac Mamtani
Affiliation:1. University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA;2. University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA;3. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;4. MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Camden, New Jersey, USA;5. Langone Medical Center, New York University, New York City, New York, USA;6. Florida Cancer Specialists and Research Institute, Sarasota, Florida, USA;7. Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA;8. Department of Urology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Abstract:Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC; 70 mg/m2) is standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma (MIBC). Many patients (pts) cannot receive cisplatin because of renal impairment, and administration of cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on day 1 + 8 or 1 + 2 (i.e., split schedule) is a commonly used alternative. In this retrospective analysis, we compared complete (pT0) and partial (p = .21), corresponding to an odds ratio for pT0 of 0.45 (95% CI, 0.16–1.31) with SS cisplatin. Split schedule cisplatin was associated with numerically but not statistically significant lower pathologic response rates relative to full dose.
Keywords:Muscle-invasive bladder cancer  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy  Cisplatin  Nephrotoxicity
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号