相倚性自我价值量表中文版在医学生中的信效度检验

目的评估相倚性自我价值(Contingencies of Self-Worth,CSW)量表中文版的信度和效度。方法在某医科大学随机抽取70名临床专业本科生进行预实验,之后采取分层抽样,选取该医科大学临床专业本科生372名进行CSW中文版的测试,2周后随机抽取70名被试进行重测。结果 CSW中文版各分量表Cronbachα系数在0.74~0.88之间,全量表α系数为0.90,重测相关系数为0.71~0.83(P<0.01)。CSW中文版的KMO值为0.82,Bartlet t检验χ2=3547.89(df=435.00,P<0.01),表明条目间有共同因子存在,可以进行因素分析。验证性因素的拟合指标NFI,CFI,GFI,RMSEA分别为0.90,0.92,0.90,0.06。结论宗教信仰分量表的内部一致性很差,不适用于我国大学生的评测,CSW中文版其他6个分量表具有良好的信度和效度,可以满足国内今后相关研究和应用的需要。

Reliability and Validity of the Contingencies of Self-Worth Scale in Medical Undergraduates.

Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Contingencies of Self-Worth（CSW） Scale.Methods The Chinese Version of the CSW Scale was administered to 70 clinical undergraduate students who were selected randomly from a medical university as a preliminary experiment.Then 372 clinical undergraduate selected by stratified sampling were tested by the Chinese Version of the CSW Scale.And 70 students were randomly selected to take a retest after two weeks.Results The Cornbrash＇s α coefficients of all the subscales of the Chinese Version of the CSW Scale ranged from 0.74 to 0.88.The Cornbrash＇s α coefficients was 0.90.The retest coefficients ranged from 0.71 to 0.83（P〈0.01）.The KMO of The Chinese Version of the CSW Scale was 0.82,and χ^2 of Bartlett was 3547.89（df=435.00,P〈0.01）,which was fit for factor analysising.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fit indexes for NFI,CFI,GFI, and RMSEA were 0.90,0.92,0.90,and 0.06.Conclusion The subscale of GOD＇s love,whose internal consistence was very low,was not suitable for college students in China.The other subscales of the Chinese Version of CSW Scale showed acceptable reliability and validity,which can be applied in related psychological research areas.