首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

比较三种不同手术方式对基底节脑出血患者长期神经功能及颅内感染的影响
引用本文:党帅.比较三种不同手术方式对基底节脑出血患者长期神经功能及颅内感染的影响[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2016,43(6):526-530.
作者姓名:党帅
作者单位:南阳市中心医院神经外科, 河南 南阳 473009
摘    要:目的探讨小骨窗手术、翼点入路经侧裂显微手术血肿清除+去骨瓣减压术及穿刺引流术对基底节脑出血患者长期神经功能及颅内感染的影响。方法将87例基底节脑出血患者按照随机数字表的顺序分为小骨窗显微血肿清除术组(A组)、穿刺引流术组(B组)及翼点入路经侧裂显微手术血肿清除+去骨瓣减压手术(C组),分析三组患者长期神经功能、颅内感染情况。结果 B组GOS评分显著高于A组(t值5.14,6.33,P0.05)。B组、C组血肿清除率显著高于A组(t=7.90,P0.05)。B组、C组改良Rankin评分、Barthel评分显著高于A组(t=2.69、3.01、3.47、5.52,P0.05)。各组颅内感染率无显著性差异(P0.05)。结论穿刺引流术、翼点入路经侧裂显微手术血肿清除+去骨瓣减压术治疗基底节脑出血的长期神经功能改善方面优于小骨窗微创手术,但术后颅内感染率无显著性差异。

关 键 词:

小骨窗显微血肿清除术|穿刺引流术|去骨瓣减压手术|长期神经功能|颅内感染

收稿时间:2016/10/10 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/12/20 0:00:00

Effects of three different surgical procedures on long-term neurological function and intracranial infection in patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage: a comparative study
DANG Shuai.Effects of three different surgical procedures on long-term neurological function and intracranial infection in patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage: a comparative study[J].Journal of International Neurology and Neurosurgery,2016,43(6):526-530.
Authors:DANG Shuai
Institution:Department of Neurosurgery two Nanyang Central Hospital, Nanyang Henan, 473009, China
Abstract:

Objective To investigate the effects of small bone window craniotomy, hematoma evacuation via the pterional-transsylvian approach combined with decompressive craniectomy, and percutaneous drainage on the long-term neurological function and intracranial infection in patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage.Methods A total of 87 patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage were randomly divided into small bone window craniotomy group (group A), percutaneous drainage group (group B), and hematoma evacuation via the pterional-transsylvian approach combined with decompressive craniectomy group (group C) using a random number table. The long-term neurological function and intracranial infection were analyzed and compared between the three groups.Results Group B had a significantly higher Glasgow Outcome Scale score than group A (t=5.14 and 6.33, P<0.05). Group B and group C had a significantly higher hematoma evacuation rate than group A (t=7.90, P<0.05). And they also had significantly higher modified Rankin score and Barthel score than group A (t=2.69, 3.01, 3.47, and 5.52, P<0.05). There was no significant difference in intracranial infection rate between the three groups (P>0.05).Conclusions For the treatment of basal ganglia hemorrhage, percutaneous drainage and hematoma evacuation via the pterional-transsylvian approach combined with decompressive craniectomy can produce a greater improvement in long-term neurological function than small bone window craniotomy. However, there is no significant difference in postoperative intracranial infection rate between them.

Keywords:

Small bone window craniotomy|Percutaneous drainage|Decompressive craniectomy|Long-term neurological function|Intracranial infection

本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《国际神经病学神经外科学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际神经病学神经外科学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号