首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Assessment of the skeletal status by MR relaxometry techniques of the lumbar spine: comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry
Authors:Maris Thomas G  Damilakis John  Sideri Liana  Deimling Michael  Papadokostakis Georgios  Papakonstantinou Olympia  Gourtsoyiannis Nikos
Affiliation:

a Departement of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion, P.O. Box 1352, 71110 Stavrakia, Heraklion, Crete, Greece

b MR Research and Development, MREA, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany

c Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Crete, Greece

d Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Crete, Greece

Abstract:Purpose: To measure lumbar spine T2*, T2, T2′ and T1 MR relaxometry parameters and compare them with lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in a group of postmenopausal women. Materials and methods: Lumbar spine T2*, T2, T2′ and T1 MR relaxometry parameters and BMD values were assessed in 101 postmenopausal women (mean age: 61.8±7.1 (1 S.D.) years); of them 63 referred to as control subjects (group A, BMD T-scores ≥ −2.5 S.D.) and 38 as osteoporotic (group B, BMD T-scores < −2.5 S.D.). All magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were performed on an 1.5 T imaging system using: (a) a 2D single slice multi echo (32 echoes) gradient echo (MEGRE) sequence (TR/TE1/TE32/FA: 160/2.7/74.93 ms/25°) for the T2* measurement, (b) a respiratory gated 2D single slice Multi Echo (16 echoes) Spin Echo (MESE) sequence (TR/TE1/TE16/FA: 2000–2500/22.5/360 ms/90°) for the T2 measurement and (c) a 2D single slice multi TI (18 repeats) turbo Fast Low Angle Shot (turbo FLASH) sequence (TR/TE/TI1/TI16/FA: 11/4.2/10/5000 ms/10°) for the T1 measurement. T2′ was calculated from its definition equation: (1/T2′ = 1/T2* − 1/T2). Lumbar spine BMD was assessed using DXA. Results: All measured parameters showed statistically significant differences between groups A and B (from P<0.05 to <0.001). All parameters showed significant associations with subject’s age ranging from r=0.245 (P<0.05) for the T2 up to r=0.377 (P<0.001) for the T2*. All parameters showed significant associations with subject’s BMD measurements ranging from r=−0.184 (P<0.05) for the R1 = (1/T1) up to r=−0.345 (P<0.0005) for the T2. Conclusion: Among the MR relaxometry parameters studied, T2* and T2 showed better discrimination of patients with osteoporosis from control subjects.
Keywords:Magnetic resonance imaging   MR relaxometry   Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry   Osteoporosis
本文献已被 ScienceDirect PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号