Image-guided spine surgery: state of the art and future directions |
| |
Authors: | Thorsten Tjardes Sven Shafizadeh Dieter Rixen Thomas Paffrath Bertil Bouillon Eva S. Steinhausen Holger Baethis |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department for Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, Chair of the University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimerstrasse 200, 51109 Cologne, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Navigation technology is a widely available tool in spine surgery and has become a part of clinical routine in many centers. The issue of where and when navigation technology should be used is still an issue of debate. It is the aim of this study to give an overview on the current knowledge concerning the technical capabilities of image-guided approaches and to discuss possible future directions of research and implementation of this technique. Based on a Medline search total of 1,462 publications published until October 2008 were retrieved. The abstracts were scanned manually for relevance to the topics of navigated spine surgery in the cervical spine, the thoracic spine, the lumbar spine, as well as ventral spine surgery, radiation exposure, tumor surgery and cost-effectivity in navigated spine surgery. Papers not contributing to these subjects were deleted resulting in 276 papers that were included in the analysis. Image-guided approaches have been investigated and partially implemented into clinical routine in virtually any field of spine surgery. However, the data available is mostly limited to small clinical series, case reports or retrospective studies. Only two RCTs and one metaanalysis have been retrieved. Concerning the most popular application of image-guided approaches, pedicle screw insertion, the evidence of clinical benefit in the most critical areas, e.g. the thoracic spine, is still lacking. In many other areas of spine surgery, e.g. ventral spine surgery or tumor surgery, image-guided approaches are still in an experimental stage. The technical development of image-guided techniques has reached a high level as the accuracies that can be achieved technically meet the anatomical demands. However, there is evidence that the interaction between the surgeon (‘human factor’) and the navigation system is a source of inaccuracy. It is concluded that more effort needs to be spend to understand this interaction. |
| |
Keywords: | Spine surgery Image-guided surgery Navigation Computer-aided surgery Computer-assisted surgery |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|