A comparison of depressed patients in randomized versus nonrandomized trials of antidepressant medication and psychotherapy |
| |
Authors: | Shauna C. Kushner M.Ed. Lena C. Quilty Ph.D. C. Psych. Carolina McBride Ph.D. C. Psych. R. Michael Bagby Ph.D. C. Psych. |
| |
Affiliation: | Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada |
| |
Abstract: | Background: Clinicians and researchers have questioned whether participants in randomized control trials (RCTs) are representative of patients in the broader clinical population. Method: We compared the demographic, clinical, and personality characteristics of patients (N=256) with major depressive disorder (MDD) receiving antidepressant medication or interpersonal therapy as part of an RCT investigation (n=105) versus in a clinic (n=151). The RCT and clinic protocols were identical with the exception of recruitment procedures (advertisement versus physician referral) and assignment to treatment (randomized versus nonrandomized). Results: No significant differences emerged between the RCT participants and clinic patients for sex, age, marital status, and education. Overall, clinic patients were no more severely depressed compared to RCT participants; there was, however, a significant interaction effect. Response rates were significantly higher for RCT participants versus clinic patients. Those participating in the RCT scored significantly higher on a personality scale assessing preference for novel experiences compared to those in the clinic. Conclusions: Differences in clinical and personality variables between those receiving treatment for MDD as part of an RCT versus in a clinic exist; however, the clinical significance of these differences remains in question, as these variables were unrelated to treatment outcome. Depression and Anxiety, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
| |
Keywords: | RCTs representativeness generalizability major depressive disorder |
|
|