首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Biological differences between focal and diffuse adenomyosis and response to hormonal treatment
Authors:Khaleque N Khan  Akira Fujishita  Akemi Koshiba  Taisuke Mori  Haruo Kuroboshi  Hiroshi Ogi  Kyoko Itoh  Masahiro Nakashima  Jo Kitawaki
Institution:1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan;2. Department of Gynecology, Saiseikai Nagasaki Hospital, 2-5-1, Katafuchi, Nagasaki 850-0000, Japan;3. Department of Pathology and Applied Neurobiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566, Japan;4. Department of Molecular and Diagnostic Pathology, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan
Abstract:

Research question

Is there any difference in ovarian steroid receptor expression and pattern of fibrosis in focal and diffuse adenomyosis and response to hormonal treatment?

Design

Prospective controlled study where biopsy samples were prospectively collected after surgery from 30 women with focal adenomyosis, 21 women with diffuse adenomyosis and 20 women with uterine myoma. Some of these women underwent 3–6 months of treatment with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) before surgery. Tissue expression of oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) was analysed by immunohistochemistry. Distribution of tissue fibrosis was examined by Masson's trichrome staining with computer-based image analysis of fibrosis in tissues derived from women with and without adenomyosis.

Results

There was no difference in ER/PR expression in gland cells/stromal cells of adenomyotic lesions on the ipsilateral side of focal adenomyosis and the anterior/posterior walls of diffuse adenomyosis. Compared to myoma tissues, a relatively decreased expression of ovarian steroid receptors was observed in both focal and diffuse adenomyosis. Image analysis of tissue fibrosis indicated more fibrosis in both focal and diffuse adenomyosis compared to fibrosis in the myometrium derived from women with uterine myoma. The pattern of fibrosis was no different in tissues derived from GnRHa-treated and -untreated women with focal and diffuse adenomyosis.

Conclusions

No difference was found in the expression of ER/PR and entity of fibrosis between women with focal and diffuse adenomyosis regardless of GnRHa treatment. A lower expression of ER/PR compared to myoma tissue potentially clarifies the biological rationale of non-response to hormonal therapies for adenomyosis.
Keywords:Diffuse adenomyosis  ER/PR expression  Fibrosis  Focal adenomyosis  Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist  GnRHa
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号