首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

改良式腹腔镜全子宫切除术的临床对比研究
引用本文:雷 琳,赵智敏.改良式腹腔镜全子宫切除术的临床对比研究[J].国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志,2013,32(5):382-383.
作者姓名:雷 琳  赵智敏
作者单位:411207 湖南省湘潭市,江南医院妇产科
摘    要:目的:探讨改良式腹腔镜全子宫切除术临床应用的安全性及疗效。方法:选择2011年1月—2012年4月行全子宫切除术者60例,随机分为改良式腹腔镜全子宫切除术(MLH)组(30例)与腹腔镜全子宫切除术(TLH)组(30例),比较2组患者的术中及术后的相关情况。结果:2组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05),子宫大小、术后住院时间和术后盆腔引流量差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论:MLH的手术时间短,术中出血量少,比TLH的临床疗效更佳,在临床上可替代TLH应用。

关 键 词:腹腔镜检查  子宫切除术  阴道式  改良式腹腔镜全子宫切除术  腹腔镜全子宫切除术  

Clinical Study of the Modified Laparoscopic Panhysterectomy
LEI Lin,ZHAO Zhi-min.Clinical Study of the Modified Laparoscopic Panhysterectomy[J].Journla of International Reproductive Health/Family Planning,2013,32(5):382-383.
Authors:LEI Lin  ZHAO Zhi-min
Institution:Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, JIANG NAN Hospital,Xiangtan 411207,Hunan Province,China
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the safety and efficacy of the modified laparoscopic panhysteroscopy(MLH). Methods:From January 2011 to April 2012, 60 cases of panhysterectomy surgeries were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 was underwent MLH. Group 2 was underwent the traditional laparoscopic panhysterectomy (TLH). Clinical features related to operation were compared. Results:There were significant differences in the operative time,the bleeding volume within operation,the time of exsufflation after operation between two groups (P<0.05). There were not significant differences in the pelvic drainage,uterine size and the time of hospitalization between two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions:MLH can substitute TLH in clinical panhysterectomy with its shorter operation time, less bleeding volume,and better curative effect.
Keywords:Laparoscopy  Hysterectomy  vaginal  Modified laparoscopic panhysteroscopy  Laparoscopic panhysterectomy  
点击此处可从《国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《国际生殖健康/计划生育杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号