Scholarly productivity for nursing clinical track faculty |
| |
Authors: | Dana Tschannen Christine Anderson Stephen Strobbe Esther Bay April Bigelow Chin Hwa Y. Dahlem Ann K. Gosselin Jennifer Pollard Julia S. Seng |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI;2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI |
| |
Abstract: | Recent years have yielded substantial advancement by clinical track faculty in cohort expansion and collective contributions to the discipline of nursing. As a result, standards for progression and promotion for clinical faculty need to be more fully developed, articulated, and disseminated. Our school formed a task force to examine benchmarks for the progression and promotion of clinical faculty across schools of nursing, with the goal of guiding faculty, reviewers, and decision makers about what constitutes excellence in scholarly productivity. Results from analyses of curriculum vitae of clinical professors or associate professors at six universities with high research activity revealed a variety of productivity among clinical track members, which included notable diversity in the types of scholarly products. Findings from this project help quantify types of scholarship for clinical faculty at the time of promotion. This work provides a springboard for greater understanding of the contributions of clinical track faculty to nursing practice. |
| |
Keywords: | Clinical track faculty Scholarship Productivity Promotion Professorial track |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|