Cost implications of using inhaled nitric oxide compared with epoprostenol for pulmonary hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cost of using intravenous epoprostenol with that of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) for treating episodes of pulmonary hypertension in children with congenital heart disease. DESIGN: An analysis of the cost of epoprostenol and NO use over the previous 18 months was performed. Three 6-month periods were identified, two in which epoprostenol was used and the third in which inhaled NO was introduced for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension. SETTING: A 10-bed pediatric cardiac intensive care unit, Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital, Alder Hey, Liverpool, England. SUBJECTS: Children with congenital heart disease and persistently elevated pulmonary artery pressure following cardiac surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The total duration of use of epoprostenol and inhaled NO was documented. The costs per hour for epoprostenol and inhaled NO were calculated and the annual cost of each agent was estimated. RESULTS: In the two 6-month periods prior to the introduction of inhaled NO, epoprostenol was used on 14 occasions (5 in the first period, 3 in the second). In the last 6-month period, nine children required pulmonary vasodilator therapy on 14 occasions. All nine children were treated successfully with inhaled NO; none were given or needed epoprostenol, as NO always was effective in providing pulmonary vasodilatation. For resistant pulmonary hypertension, increasing the concentration of NO would have been the next therapeutic option. The cost for the two 6-month periods using epoprostenol was $19,483.48 for the drug and $283.25 for equipment costs (total cost $19,766.73). There was no expenditure on epoprostenol in the final 6-month period. The cost of NO was $465. However, the total expenditure, including the delivery and monitoring system, was $4,722.85. CONCLUSIONS: Using inhaled NO in our pediatric cardiac intensive care unit abolished the use of epoprostenol during the reported monitoring period. The cost savings were significant, amounting to 12% of the annual drug budget for the unit. The cost of setting up the inhaled NO delivery system is recouped rapidly. The ease of delivery and measurement of inhaled NO also may have contributed to its increased clinical use.