首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Burnout of the US midwifery workforce and the role of practice environment
Authors:E Brie Thumm  Denise C Smith  Allison P Squires  Ginger Breedlove  Paula M Meek
Institution:1. College of Nursing, University of Colorado College of Nursing, Aurora Colorado, USA ; 2. College of Nursing, New York University Rory Meyers School of Nursing, New York New York, USA ; 3. Grow Midwives, Shawnee Kansas, USA ; 4. College of Nursing, University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City Utah, USA
Abstract:ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence of burnout among the midwifery workforce and the association between fixed personal and practice characteristics and modifiable organizational factors, specifically practice environment, to burnout among midwives in the United States.Data SourcePrimary data collection was conducted via an online survey of the complete national roster of certified nurse‐midwives and certified midwives over 3 weeks in April 2017.Study DesignThe study was a cross‐sectional observational survey consisting of 95 items about personal and practice characteristics, respondents'' practice environments, and professional burnout.Data Collection MethodsThe inclusion criterion was actively practicing midwifery in the United States. Data were analyzed with bivariate analyses to determine the association between personal and practice characteristics and burnout. A hierarchal multilinear regression evaluated the interrelationship between personal and practice characteristics, practice environment, and burnout.Principal FindingsOf the almost one third (30.9%) of certified nurse‐midwives and certified midwives who responded to the survey, 40.6% met criteria for burnout. Weak negative correlations existed between burnout and indicators of career longevity: age (r(2256) = −0.09, p < 0.01), years as a midwife (r(2267) = −0.07, p = 0.01), and years with employer (r(2271) = −0.05, p = 0.02). There were significant relationships between burnout score and patient workload indicators: patients per day in outpatient setting (F(5,2292) = 13.995, p < 0.01), birth volume (F(3,1864) = 8.35, p < 0.01), and patient acuity (F(2,2295) = 20.21, p < 0.01). When the practice environment was entered into the model with personal and practice characteristics, the explained variance increased from 6.4% to 26.5% (F(20,1478) = 27.98, p < 0.01).ConclusionsOur findings suggested that a key driver of burnout among US midwives was the practice environment, specifically practice leadership and participation and support for the midwifery model of care. Structural and personal characteristics contributed less to burnout score than the practice environment, implying that prevention of burnout may be achieved through organizational support and does not require structural changes to the provision of perinatal health.
Keywords:burnout  childbirth  leadership  midwifery  nurse‐  midwives  pregnancy
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号