|
|||||
|
|
Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis |
|
| Authors: | Kazuichi Okazaki Shigeyuki Kawa Terumi Kamisawa Tetsuhide Ito Kazuo Inui Hiroyuki Irie Takayoshi Nishino Kenji Notohara Isao Nishimori Shigeki Tanaka Toshimasa Nishiyama Koichi Suda Keiko Shiratori Masao Tanaka Tooru Shimosegawa |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University, 2-3-1 Shinmachi, Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan 2. Center for Health, Safety and Environmental Management, Shinshu University, Matsumoto, Japan 3. Department of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan 4. Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan 5. Department of Gastroenterology, Second Teaching Hospital, Fujita Health University, Nagoya, Japan 6. Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan 7. Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Yachiyo Medical Center, Yachiyo, Japan 8. Department of Anatomic Pathology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan 9. Nishimori Clinic, Kochi, Japan 10. Department of Acupuncture and Moxibusion, Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences, Tokyo, Japan 11. Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan 12. Department of Pathology, Tokyo-West Tokushukai Hospital, Tokyo, Japan 13. Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan 14. Department of Surgery and Oncology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan 15. Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan |
| Abstract: | BackgroundIn response to the proposal of the international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and the Japanese diagnostic criteria in 2011, the 2009 Japanese consensus guidelines for managing AIP required revision.MethodsThree committees [the professional committee for making clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators] were organized. Fifteen specialists for AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from 1,843 articles published between 1963 and 2012 (obtained from Pub Med and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. The expert panel individually rated the clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than seven on a nine-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid.ResultsThe professional committee created 13 CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis of AIP, 6 for extra-pancreatic lesions, 6 for differential diagnosis, and 11 for treatment.ConclusionAfter evaluation by the moderators, amendments to the Japanese consensus guidelines for AIP have been proposed for 2013. |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录！ | |