Contrast agent bolus tracking with a fixed threshold or a manual fast start for coronary CT angiography

Objectives

Comparison of bolus tracking with a fixed threshold versus a manual fast start for coronary CT angiography.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed 320-row coronary CT angiography of 50 patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Twenty-five examinations were initiated by a bolus tracking method (group 1), 25 examinations with a manual fast surestart (group 2).

Results

Mean attenuation values in the ascending aorta were 519?±?111 Hounsfield units (HU) in group 1 and 476?±?65 HU in group 2 (p?=?0.10). Assessable vessel lengths were 171?±?44 mm vs 172?±?29 mm for the right coronary artery (p?=?0.91), 11?±?4 mm vs 12?±?4 mm for the left main (p?=?0.9), 163?±?28 mm vs 151?±?26 mm for the left anterior descending coronary artery (p?=?0.11) and 125?±?41 mm vs 110?±?37 mm for the left circumflex coronary artery (p?=?0.18). Image quality for all coronary arteries was not significantly different between the groups (p?>?0.41). The attenuation ratio between the left and right ventricle was 2.8?±?0.7 vs 3.6?±?1.0 (p?=?0.003). Significantly less contrast agent was used in group 2 (64?±?6 ml vs 80?±?0 ml; p?<?0.001).

Conclusions

Bolus tracking with a fixed threshold and with a manual fast start are both suitable methods; the fast start allowed a reduction of contrast agent volumes.

Key Points

? Fixed threshold bolus tracking is suitable for coronary 320-row CT angiography ? Manual fast start bolus tracking can reduce contrast agent volumes ? Manual fast start and fixed threshold initiation achieve good image quality ? Fixed threshold bolus tracking achieves a more reliable contrast bolus position