Affiliation: | (1) Harvard Medical School, Unit 105, 111 Gainsborough, Boston, MA 02115, USA;(2) Cancer Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Sydney, Australia;(3) Herbal Medicines Research & Education Centre, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Sydney, Australia |
Abstract: | Purpose PC SPES is an eight-component herbal product marketed for the treatment of prostate cancer. The manufacturer of PC SPES claims that the herbal combination is a synergistic blend, but the purported synergy has never been tested. We examined the interaction in cell culture of these eight individual herbal components by the use of an isobologram.Methods US patent no. 5,665,393 (1997) for PC SPES was acquired, and each of the eight herbal components described was acquired, properly identified, and extracted by 95% ethanol. The extracts were tested for cytotoxicity to PC 3 human prostate cancer cells in culture by the MTT (3-[4,5-dimethythiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. Seven combinations of herbal extracts were made, varying in the proportion of the most cytotoxic herbal extract, that of Panax notoginseng. The interactions of P. notoginseng with the other seven herbs were evaluated through the use of an isobologram.Results In all seven herbal combinations, P. notoginseng was found to be antagonistic with the other seven herbal components in the cytotoxicity assay (P values: 0.09, 0.12, 0.12, 0.33, 0.45, 0.56, and 0.76).Conclusions The interaction between the most cytotoxic herbal component of a widely used herbal product and the other seven components was antagonistic. Herbal combinations are no different from traditional combination pharmacotherapy. If herbal combinations are able to achieve antagonism, then theoretically they can achieve synergism if combined properly. |