A double-blind cross-over controlled study to evaluate the effect of human biosynthetic growth hormone on ovarian stimulation in previous poor responders to in-vitro fertilization

The effect of exogenous human biosynthetic growth hormone (HGH;12 IU/day; Norditropin, Novo-Nordisk) on the response to ovarianstimulation using a buserelin/human menopausal gonadotrophin(HMG) regimen was assessed in women who had previously showna ‘poor response’ in spite of increasing doses ofHMG. Forty patients were recruited into a prospective double-blindplacebo-controlled study. The serum follicle stimulating hormone(FSH) on day 2–5 of a menstrual cycle (< 10 IU/I) wasused to exclude any peri-menopausal candidates. The urinary24 h GH secretion was normal in all patients. Thirty-three patientscompleted the study with 21 patients having human chorionicgonadotrophin (HCG) in both arms, thus providing a completeset of placebo control data. Of these 21 patients, the administrationof HGH compared to the placebo cycle resulted in increased serumconcentrations of fasting insulin on the 8th (median 3.9 versus5.8 mU/I; P < 0.0005) and13th (median 4.4 versus 5.8 mU/I;P < 0.05) day of HMG in those cycles receiving HGH. After8 days of co-treatment with HGH the number of cohort follicles(14–16.9 mm) was significantly increased, but this changewas not sustained on the day of HCG administration. No statisticaldifference in the serum oestradiol on the 8th day of HMG orday of HCG, length of the follicular phase, total dose of HMGused, or the number of oocytes collected was seen between theplacebo or HGH cycles. This study demonstrates that HGH doesnot improve the ovarian response to ovulation induction in previouspoor responders.