Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to quantify pelvic organ prolapse: reliability of assessment and correlation with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms |
| |
Authors: | Mari?lle M E Lakeman F M Zijta J Peringa A J Nederveen J Stoker J P W R Roovers |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Centre, Room H4-205, PO Box 22700, 1105 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2. Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3. Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
| |
Abstract: | Introduction and hypothesis The aim of this study was to assess the interobserver agreement of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based staging of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to quantify associations between MRI-based POP staging, findings at pelvic examination, and pelvic floor symptoms. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of ten symptomatic POP patients, ten symptomatic patients without POP, and ten nulliparous asymptomatic women. Three different observers performed MRI-based POP staging using the pubococcygeal line (PCL), midpubic line (MPL), perineal line, and H line as references. Results The interobserver agreement of MRI-based staging of the anterior and middle compartment was good to excellent. In symptomatic women without prolapse, MRI-based and pelvic-examination-based POP staging were poorly correlated. In none of the women were MRI-based POP Quantification (POP-Q) staging and pelvic floor symptoms strongly associated. Conclusion The interobserver agreement of MRI-based POP staging is excellent, but the added clinical value of such staging is questionable due to poor association with clinical findings and pelvic floor symptoms. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|