首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Maximum urethral closure pressure in women: normative data and evaluation as a diagnostic test
Authors:Dharmesh S Kapoor  Fadi Housami  Paul White  Lucy Swithinbank  Marcus Drake
Institution:1. Bristol Urological Institute, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB, UK
3. Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, BH7 7DW, UK
2. Department of Statistics, University of West of England, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK
Abstract:

Introduction and hypothesis

Our goal was to identify correlates of maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) and MUCP as a diagnostic test for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods

This study was a retrospective review of women with non-neurological referrals for urinary incontinence between1995 and 2006.

Results

We studied the characteristics of 8,644 women who underwent urodynamics for non-neurological referrals. Mean MUCP was 48?cm?H2O in urodynamic stress incontinence (USI), 50?cm?H2O in mixed urinary incontinence (MUI), 65?cm?H2O in detrusor overactivity incontinence (DOI) and 67?cm?H2O for continent women . Age and MUCP were negatively correlated in all groups. Multiple regression analysis showed lower levels of MUCP in women with USI who also had previous hysterectomy or anti-incontinence surgery or who were in an older age group. Previous anti-incontinence surgery and older age were risk factors for lower MUCP in women with MUI and DOI. Receiver operator curves did not show MUCP to have utility as a diagnostic test despite age and parity stratification. MUCP?<?20?cm?H2O showed a sensitivity of 5?% and specificity of 98?% in diagnosing USI.

Conclusions

MUCP failed to meet the criteria for a diagnostic test. Women with USI and MUI have lower MUCP than women with DOI and continent women in each decade of life. MUCP decreases with age.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号