不同针灸疗法留针60min治疗肩关节周围炎疗效比较

目的:观察并比较不同针灸疗法留针60min治疗肩关节周围炎的疗效,方法:将预纳入患者进行完全随机分组分为毫针组、电针组(频率选用2/100Hz)、温针灸组(每壮艾绒重3g)等3组进行治疗,分别测定治疗前和治疗后肩部疼痛指数和肩关节活动度评分,隔日1次,5次1疗程,观察并比较各组的疗效。结果:3种疗法治疗肩周炎均有一定的疗效,与治疗前比较有非常显著差异(P0.01)。其中,在3组中温针灸组总有效率达95.65%较电针组和毫针组整体疗效好,差异有非常显著意义(P0.01),且在缓解疼痛和改善肩关节活动度上效果显著(P0.05)。

Comparison Study on Therapeutic Efficacy of Different Acupuncture Methods Treating 60min on Pain in Frozen Shoulder

Objective:To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of different acupuncture methods for 60min in treating frozen shoulder pain.Methods:All the outpatients scheduled to frozen shoulders were randomly divided into filiform needle group,electroacupuncture(EA) group(2/100Hz Frequency) and warming needle group(weight 3g moxa).Three groups were treated for 60min.Pain and movement of shoulder joint were taken as observed indexes before and after treatments.Five times made a course to observe and compare the therapeutic efficacy of each group.Results:Three kinds of different acupuncture methods in treating frozen shoulder pain all got certain therapeutic effects,which had significant difference compared with before treatment(P<0.01).The total therapeutic results of warming needle group was 95.65%,which had significant difference with EA group and filiform needle group,warming needle received a higher satisfactoriness from patients and also had significant difference in alleviating frozen shoulder pain and improving activities of joint functions,compared with EA group and filiform needle group(P<0.05).However there was no difference between EA group and filiform needle group(P>0.05).