首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

曲唑酮与文拉法辛治疗抑郁症的对照研究
引用本文:许爱宏,王俊. 曲唑酮与文拉法辛治疗抑郁症的对照研究[J]. 精神医学杂志, 2004, 17(1): 14-15
作者姓名:许爱宏  王俊
作者单位:山东省滨州市人民医院 256610(许爱宏),山东省滨州市人民医院 256610(王俊)
摘    要:目的 评价曲唑酮治疗抑郁症的临床疗效和副反应。方法 对 72例抑郁症患者随机分为曲唑酮组 (36例 )与文拉法辛组 (36例 )进行对照性研究 ,疗程 8周 ,采用汉密顿抑郁量表 (HAMD) ,汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、临床总体印象量表 (CGI)及副反应量表 (TESS)评定疗效及副反应。结果 曲唑酮与文拉法辛的临床疗效相似 ,两组的显效率和有效率分别为 6 1%、78%与 6 1%、81% ,差异无显著性 (P >0 0 5 ) ,副反应两组间差异也无显著性 (P >0 0 5 )。结论 曲唑酮与文拉法辛相比 ,在治疗抑郁症方面 ,有相似的疗效和安全性

关 键 词:曲唑酮 文拉法辛 抑郁症 临床对照研究 副反应 药物疗法 安全性
文章编号:1009-7201(2004)-01-0014-02
修稿时间:2002-02-25

Comparison of trazodone and venlafaxine in the treatment of depression
Xu Aihong,Wang Jun.Binzhou People's Hospital,Shandong ,China. Comparison of trazodone and venlafaxine in the treatment of depression[J]. Journal of Psychiatry, 2004, 17(1): 14-15
Authors:Xu Aihong  Wang Jun.Binzhou People's Hospital  Shandong   China
Affiliation:Xu Aihong,Wang Jun.Binzhou People's Hospital,Shandong 256610,China
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy and side effects of trazodone in the treatment of depression.Methods A total of 72 outpatients who met CCMD-2-R criteria for depression were randomly assigned to trazodone(n=36)or venlafaxine(n=36)treatment for 8 weeks.The efficacy was measured with Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD),Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA),and Clinical Global Impressions(CGI).The adverse effects were determined by the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS).Results The efficacy rates of trazodone and venlafaxine were 78%and 81%respectively,and the marked improvement rates were both 61%.There was no significant difference between two groups in efficacy.The adverse effects had no difference in two groups.Conclusion It is suggested that trazodone was as same as venlafaxine in safty and efficacy.
Keywords:Depression Trazodone Venlafaxine
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号