首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后放置引流管的效果评价
引用本文:杨瑞,蒋辉,许可,周骏,孙炜玮.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后放置引流管的效果评价[J].解放军医学高等专科学校学报,2014(4):347-348.
作者姓名:杨瑞  蒋辉  许可  周骏  孙炜玮
作者单位:解放军第161医院普通外科,湖北武汉430012
摘    要:目的评价腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)后放置引流管的临床效果。方法将312例拟行LC治疗患者随机分为两组,非引流组(n=158)术后未行常规预防性腹腔引流;引流组(n=154)术后行常规预防性腹腔引流。观察两组术后一般情况及并发症等情况。结果非引流组患者术后排气时间和术后住院时间较引流组患者明显缩短(P〈0.05);两组术后并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论应严格掌握放置腹腔引流管的指征,一般行LC治疗患者术后不放置腹腔引流管是合理可行的,更有利于患者的康复。

关 键 词:腹腔镜胆囊切除术  腹腔引流  胆囊

Evaluation of drainage tube placement after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Yang Rui,Jiang Hui,Xu Ke,Zhou Jun,Sun Weiwei.Evaluation of drainage tube placement after laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].Clinical Journal of Medical Officer,2014(4):347-348.
Authors:Yang Rui  Jiang Hui  Xu Ke  Zhou Jun  Sun Weiwei
Institution:(Department of General Surgery, PLA 161st Hospital, Wuhan Hubei 430012, China)
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of placing a drainage tube after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods A total of 312 patients scheduled for LC were divided into two groups at random, i.e. non-drainage group (n = 158) and drainage group (n=154). The non-drainage group did not receive postoperatively prophylactic abdominal drainage and the drainage group underwent the drainage. The general condition and postoperative complications of the two groups were observed. Results The post- operative exhausting time and hospital stay of the non-drainage group was significantly earlier or shorter than that of the drainage group ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; there was no significant difference in postoperative complication rate between the two groups ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion The indications for abdominal drainage tube placement should be strictly controlled. It is reasonable and feasible for the majority of patients who have undergone LC not to be placed abdominal drainage tube.
Keywords:laparoscopic cholecystectomy  abdominal drainage  gallbladder
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号