A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Comparison of Nocturnal Roxatidine in tHe Treatment of Active Duodenal Ulcer Disease |
| |
Authors: | Norman H. Gilinsky M.D. F.A.C.G. Peter Bright-Asare M.D. Barton L. Cobert M.D. F.A.C.G. Duane D. Fitch M. D. Frank L. Lanza M. D. F.A.C.G. Robert M. Kerr M.D. F.A.C.G. J. P. Savitsky M.D. Other Members of the Multicenter Roxatidine Cooperative Study Group |
| |
Affiliation: | University of Cincinnati, Ohio. |
| |
Abstract: | This multicenter randomized, double-blind, 4-wk study compared the new H2-receptor antagonistic roxatidine (R) to placebo (P) for treatment of endoscopically diagnosed active duodenal ulcer disease. Subjects were evaluated after 2 and 4 wk of treatment. Those whose ulcer was unhealed at 2 wk received 2 more weeks of treatment before final evaluation. Ulcer healing (endoscopically determined) with roxatidine was more effective than placebo at both wk 0-2 (R = 33.9%, P = 21.9%, p = 0.018) and wk 2-4 (R = 68.2%, P = 29.7%, p less than 0.001), with an overall 4-wk effectiveness of 78.9% compared to 44.8% (p less than 0.001). At the end of treatment, average maximum ulcer diameter diminished 83% in R and 50% in P (p less than 0.001). Roxatidine was also more effective than placebo in decreasing abdominal pain (p less than 0.001), decreasing the number of antacid tablets taken for pain relief (p less than 0.001), improving dyspeptic symptoms (p less than 0.001), and permitting return to a normal routine for subjects with previous illness-imposed restrictions on work and/or other daily activities. The profile of laboratory values and adverse experiences demonstrated roxatidine to be safe and well-tolerated. The efficacy of roxatidine as evaluated by the healing rate of duodenal ulcer and reduction in abdominal pain emphasize its value as an addition to the family of H2-receptor antagonists. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|