Interrupter technique versus plethysmography for measurement of respiratory resistance in children with asthma or cystic fibrosis

The purpose of the present study was to compare measurements of respiratory system resistance by the interrupter method (Rrsint) with those of airway resistance by plethysmography (Raw) in nonobstructed children with asthma or cystic fibrosis (ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 sec to vital capacity, FEV(1)/VC >/=80% with a forced expiratory flow rate between 25-75% of forced vital capacity, FEF(25-75) >/=75% of normal values) and in obstructed children with the same diseases (FEV(1)/VC <80% and/or FEF(25-75) <75% of normal values). Eighty-one children (47 asthmatics and 34 suffering from cystic fibrosis) aged 5-18 years (mean 11.2 +/- SD 3.4 years) were included in the study. For the overall group, we observed generally lower values for Raw (4.7 +/- 2. 8 cmH(2)O.L(-).s) than for Rrsint20 (extrapolation of the mouth pressure during occlusion to 40 ms after interruption) (5.6 +/- 1.7 cmH(2)O.L(-1).s) (P < 0.02), or for Rrsint40 (extrapolation of the mouth pressure during occlusion to 60 ms after interruption) (6.6 +/- 2.2 cmH(2)O.L(-1).s) (P < 0.001), but there was no difference between Rrsint20 and Raw in the obstructed subgroup. Moreover, we observed a correlation between the difference (Rrsint20 - Raw) expressed in percentage of predicted values and the degree of obstruction estimated by FEV(1)/VC (r = 0.56, P < 0.001). The differences between the specific resistances (sRrsint20 - sRaw, sRrsint40 - sRaw) were also correlated with the severity of the obstruction (r = 0.65, P < 0.001 and r = 0.57, P < 0.001, respectively). We observed also that the tendency to underestimate resistance by Rrsint in obstructed children was not the same in children with asthma and cystic fibrosis. We conclude that the tendency of Rrsint, as measured with our method, to underestimate airway obstruction appears to increase in proportion to the severity of the airway obstruction.