首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Radiobiological optimization comparison between pulse-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer
Authors:Pierre Annede  Isabelle Dumas  Antoine Schernberg  Anne Tailleur  Ingrid Fumagalli  Sophie Bockel  Fabien Mignot  Manon Kissel  Eric Deutsch  Christine Haie-meder  Cyrus Chargari
Affiliation:1. Radiotherapy Department, Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France;2. INSERM U1030, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France;3. Faculté de médecine PARIS Sud, université Paris Sud, Université Paris Saclay, Paris, France;4. French Military Health Services Academy, Ecole du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, France;5. Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Bretigny-sur-Orge, France
Abstract:PurposeOnly scarce data are available on the possibility to include radiobiological optimization as part of the dosimetric process in cervical cancer treated with brachytherapy (BT). We compared dosimetric outcomes of pulse-dose-rate (PDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR)-BT, according to linear-quadratic model.Methods and MaterialsThree-dimensional dosimetric data of 10 consecutive patients with cervical cancer undergoing intracavitary image-guided adaptive PDR-BT after external beam radiation therapy were examined. A new HDR plan was generated for each patient using the same method as for the PDR plan. The procedure was intended to achieve the same D90 high-risk clinical target volume with HDR as with PDR planning after conversion into dose equivalent per 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) following linear-quadratic model. Plans were compared for dosimetric variables.ResultsAs per study's methodology, the D90 high-risk clinical target volume was strictly identical between PDR and HDR plans: 91.0 Gy (interquartile: 86.0–94.6 Gy). The median D98 intermediate-risk clinical target volume was 62.9 GyEQD2 with HDR vs. 65.0 GyEQD2 with PDR (p < 0.001). The median bladder D2cc was 65.6 GyEQD2 with HDR, vs. 62 GyEQD2 with PDR (p = 0.004). Doses to the rectum, sigmoid, and small bowel were higher with HDR plans with a median D2cc of 55.6 GyEQD2 (vs. 55.1 GyEQD2, p = 0.027), 67.2 GyEQD2 (vs. S 64.7 GyEQD2, p = 0.002), and 69.4 GyEQD2 (vs. 66.8 GyEQD2, p = 0.014), respectively. For organs at risk (OARs), the effect of radiobiological weighting depended on the dose delivered. When OARs BT contribution to D2cc doses was <20 GyEQD2, both BT modalities were equivalent. OARs EQD2 doses were all higher with HDR when BT contribution to D2cc was ≥20 GyEQD2.ConclusionBoth BT modalities provided satisfactory target volume coverage with a slightly higher value with the HDR technique for OARs D2cc while intermediate-risk clinical target volume received higher dose in the PDR plan. The radiobiological benefit of PDR over HDR was predominant when BT contribution dose to OARs was >20 Gy.
Keywords:Corresponding author at: Radiation Oncology Department, Brachytherapy Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800 Villejuif, France. Tel.: +33 1 4211 4566   fax: +33 1 4211 5208.  Linear-quadratic model  Pulse-dose-rate brachytherapy  High-dose-rate brachytherapy  Cervical cancer  Radiobiological effect
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号