对镇乡内“农业户口”人群普及心肺复苏技能的形式探讨

目的 探讨对“农业户口”人群用语言或实践教育法两种不同形式进行徒手心肺复苏(cardiopulmonary resuscitation,CPR)技能培训的近、远期效果,以确定对“农业户口”人群急救技能培训的更有效方法.方法 将989名“农业户口”人群随机分成A组721人和B组268人.A组用语言教育法进行CPR培训,B组用实践教育法.培训前,培训后即刻,培训后3、6个月进行考核,对考核结果进行统计学分析.结果 2组采用的方法近期效果满意(正确率均＞90％),2组比较无显著差异,培训后3、6个月的效果B组优于A组,2组学员在培训后6个月时均已出现较高遗忘率.结论 “农业户口”人群对急救技能培训有着同样的迫切性.从语言教育法转为实践教育法应该是对“农业户口”人群实施急救技能培训更可取的形式.同时,4h可作为CPR实践教育法培训的时长,6个月可作为复训周期.

Exploration of the training form of cardiopulmonary resuscitation popularization among agricultural residence registration population in towns and villages

Objective To explore the short and long-term effect of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training for agricultural residence registration population with the language education and practice education,in order to establish a more effective method of first-aid training for agriculture population.Methods 989 agricultural residence registration people were divided into group A (721 people)and group B (268 people) randomly.Group A received CPR training with language education and group B adopted practice education.On the time before and after training immediatelythe 3rd and 6th month after training,we checked the training results and analyzed the data with statistical methods.Results The short- term effect of two methods was satisfying (accuracy more then 90％ ) and without statistical significance.The effect of group B was better than group A in the 3rd and 6th month after training.Two groups showed higher forgetting rate and some accuracy were less than 50％.Conclusions Agriculture population is in urgent need of first-aid.It may be a more effective method of first-aid training for agriculture population to transform gradually from language education to practice education.At the same time,we may use 4 hours as CPR practice education training time and 6 months as re-training period.