首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Designed nanomolar small-molecule inhibitors of Ena/VASP EVH1 interaction impair invasion and extravasation of breast cancer cells
Authors:Matthias Barone  Matthias Müller  Slim Chiha  Jiang Ren  Dominik Albat  Arne Soicke  Stephan Dohmen  Marco Klein  Judith Bruns  Maarten van Dinther  Robert Opitz  Peter Lindemann  Monika Beerbaum  Kathrin Motzny  Yvette Roske  Peter Schmieder  Rudolf Volkmer  Marc Nazar  Udo Heinemann  Hartmut Oschkinat  Peter ten Dijke  Hans-Günther Schmalz  Ronald Kühne
Abstract:Battling metastasis through inhibition of cell motility is considered a promising approach to support cancer therapies. In this context, Ena/VASP-depending signaling pathways, in particular interactions with their EVH1 domains, are promising targets for pharmaceutical intervention. However, protein–protein interactions involving proline-rich segments are notoriously difficult to address by small molecules. Hence, structure-based design efforts in combination with the chemical synthesis of additional molecular entities are required. Building on a previously developed nonpeptidic micromolar inhibitor, we determined 22 crystal structures of ENAH EVH1 in complex with inhibitors and rationally extended our library of conformationally defined proline-derived modules (ProMs) to succeed in developing a nanomolar inhibitor (Kd=120nM,MW=734 Da). In contrast to the previous inhibitor, the optimized compounds reduced extravasation of invasive breast cancer cells in a zebrafish model. This study represents an example of successful, structure-guided development of low molecular weight inhibitors specifically and selectively addressing a proline-rich sequence-recognizing domain that is characterized by a shallow epitope lacking defined binding pockets. The evolved high-affinity inhibitor may now serve as a tool in validating the basic therapeutic concept, i.e., the suppression of cancer metastasis by inhibiting a crucial protein–protein interaction involved in actin filament processing and cell migration.

Metastasis is a complex multistep process (1, 2) employing, among others, mechanisms governing actin cytoskeleton dynamics involving integrin signaling and actin regulatory proteins (35). So far, all approved antimetastatic drugs antagonize integrins (6) or inhibit downstream kinases (7, 8) (SI Appendix, Fig. S1). In the metastatic setting however, these drugs appear to have only limited success (913) and 5-y survival is not increasing satisfactorily (14, 15), making new approaches in antimetastatic drug development essential to meet this urgent medical need.The enabled/vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein protein family (Ena/VASP) acts as a crucial hub in cell migration by linking actin filaments to invadopodia and focal adhesions (1622). Due to their role in the transformation of benign lesions into invasive and metastatic cancer, Ena/VASP proteins are discussed as part of the invasive signature and as a marker of breast carcinogenesis (2325). At the advanced tumor stage, the protein family is overexpressed (2628), which has been shown to increase migration speed in vivo (29) and to potentiate invasiveness (30). Yet, no sufficiently potent probes to interfere with Ena/VASP in vivo have been reported.The three vertebrate Ena/VASP family members, enabled homolog (ENAH), VASP, and Ena-VASP-like (EVL), share a tripartite structural organization in which two Ena/VASP homology domains (EVH1 and EVH2) are separated by a more divergent proline-rich central part. Interactions of the EVH2 domain are involved in the elongation and protection of barbed-end actin filaments from capping proteins and tetramerization (31, 32). EVH1 folds into a structured globular domain that interacts with proteins at focal adhesions (33), the leading edge (34, 35), and invadopodia (36, 37) by recognizing the motif F/W/L/Y]PxϕP (35, 38) (ϕ hydrophobic, x any; SI Appendix, Fig. S3) in poly-L-proline type II helix (PPII) conformation.In the course of our research into small molecules as potential inhibitors of protein–protein interactions (39) we recently in silico designed and stereo-selectively synthesized scaffolds, coined ProMs, which mimic pairs of prolines in PPII conformation (40). The modular combination of different ProMs thereby allowed us to generate nonpeptidic secondary-structure mimetics that fulfill the steric requirements of the addressed proline-rich motif-recognizing domain (4147). For the EVH1 domain, our proof-of-concept study yielded a canonically binding, nontoxic, cell-membrane-permeable, 706-Da inhibitor 1 (Fig. 1A) composed of two different ProM scaffolds and 2-chloro-(L)-phenylalanine (2-Cl-Phe) (40). While the synthetic inhibitor 1 represents the compound with the highest reported affinity toward Ena/VASP EVH1 domains, a further improvement was required for in vivo experiments. Here we report successful structure-based optimization of inhibitor 1 based on 22 high-resolution crystal structures of ENAH EVH1 in complex with different inhibitors (SI Appendix, Tables S1–S6), including the well-resolved C-terminal binding epitope TEDEL of ActA from Listeria monocytogenes (48). Newly identified interaction sites adjacent to the C terminus of 1 were addressed by in silico designed and stereo-selectively synthesized modifications of the ProM-1 scaffold (Fig. 1A). While drastically increasing the affinity against a rather flat protein surface we conserved structural simplicity, low molecular weight, nontoxicity, and cell-membrane permeability. Potent compounds against Ena/VASP were shown to also act in vivo, i.e., by inhibiting cancer cell extravasation in zebrafish at only 1 μM, thereby paving the way for future preclinical studies.Open in a separate windowFig. 1.(A) Structure of the first-generation Ena/VASP EVH1 inhibitor 1. All compositions share the N-acetylated 2-chloro-phenylalanine unit (blue) attached to a central ProM-2 scaffold (red). Esterification of the C terminus renders the inhibitors cell-membrane permeable (40). (B) General (modular) architecture of nonpeptidic, conformationally preorganized inhibitors used in this study. Structural variation (pink) was achieved by replacing the C-terminal ProM-1 unit (green) by ProM-9, ProM-13, ProM-12, ProM-15, or ProM-17 (
Keywords:protein–  protein interactions  metastasis  small molecules  peptide mimetics  proline-rich motif
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号