腹腔镜与传统开腹术治疗直肠癌的手术并发症比较

目的 探讨腹腔镜下行结直肠肿瘤手术的可行性。方法 回顾性分析近3年110例腹腔镜下行结直肠癌切除于术的临床资料。中转开腹24例，腹腔镜下完成结直肠手术86例。其中右半结肠切除术5例，左半结肠切除术2例．乙状结肠切除术10例，Dixon术22例，Miles术46例，全大肠切除术1例。结果 全组尢手术纯亡病例？腹腔镜手术时间120～360（平均225）min．术中出血20～400（平均135）mL。淋巴结切除数1～30（平均8．7）个，阳性淋巴结数0～24（平均2．2）个。术中发生并发症6例：包括输尿管损伤1例，出血5例，均经及时中转于术解决。术后发生尿瘘2例，大出血2例，肠梗阻2例，均经冉手术治愈。术后12～72h均恢复胃肠功能。术后住院7～15（平均8．6）d。随访100例（90．9％），随访时间1～33（、平均14．3）个月。1例Miles术后3个月发生会阴部转移；3例术后6～15个月腹腔广泛种植转移。末发现套管针穿刺部位及小切口部位肿瘤转移。结论 腹腔镜下行结直肠肿瘤切除手术在技术上是町行的，且具有创伤小、出血少、胃肠干扰少、术后疼痛轻、恢复快等优点，可以达到安全根治性切除肿瘤的目的．

Comparison of the complications of treatment of rectal cancer by laparoscopic versus conventional laparotomy procedure

Objective:To compare the postoperative complications rate of total mesorectal excision (TME) performed by laparoscopic and conventional laparotomy method in treatment of rectal cancer.Methods:The clinical data of patients with rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery(n=42) or traditional laparotomy (n=50) were retrospectively analysed to analysis of the cause and occurrence rate of complications. Results:The laparoscopic group had an advantage over the conventional laparotomy group in bowel movement recovery, earlier mobility and short hospital stay time. There was no difference in intraoperative injury, anastomotic leakage, sexual function preservation, long term urinary dysfunction, and local recurrence or incision metastasis rates. Conclusions:Laparoscopic TME treatment of rectal cancer had the same therapeutic effect as the conventional laparotomy procedure did, and has a better subjective outcome.