Variability of bronchial measurements obtained by sequential CT using two computer-based methods

This study aimed to evaluate the variability of lumen (LA) and wall area (WA) measurements obtained on two successive MDCT acquisitions using energy-driven contour estimation (EDCE) and full width at half maximum (FWHM) approaches. Both methods were applied to a database of segmental and subsegmental bronchi with LA > 4 mm² containing 42 bronchial segments of 10 successive slices that best matched on each acquisition. For both methods, the 95% confidence interval between repeated MDCT was between –1.59 and 1.5 mm² for LA, and –3.31 and 2.96 mm² for WA. The values of the coefficient of measurement variation (CV₁₀, i.e., percentage ratio of the standard deviation obtained from the 10 successive slices to their mean value) were strongly correlated between repeated MDCT data acquisitions (r > 0.72; p < 0.0001). Compared with FWHM, LA values obtained using EDCE were higher for LA < 15 mm², whereas WA values were lower for bronchi with WA < 13 mm²; no systematic EDCE underestimation or overestimation was observed for thicker-walled bronchi. In conclusion, variability between CT examinations and assessment techniques may impair measurements. Therefore, new parameters such as CV₁₀ need to be investigated to study bronchial remodeling. Finally, EDCE and FWHM are not interchangeable in longitudinal studies.