注视焦虑评定量表测评大学生的效度和信度

目的:检验注视焦虑评定量表(GARS)中文版测评大学生群体的适用性。方法:选取北京市某高校大学生352名(样本1)用于条目分析、探索性因子分析和效度检验,另外选取大学生229名(样本2)用于验证性因子分析和内部一致性信度检验,选取大学生27名(样本3)进行间隔2周的重测。以社会交往焦虑量表(SIAS)、恐惧负性评价简表(BFNE)、状态特质焦虑量表(STAI)、流调用抑郁量表(CES-D)和大五人格问卷简式版(CBF-PI-B)为效标问卷。结果:探索性因子分析得到能力表现、演讲和日常3个因子;验证性因子分析显示模型拟合良好(χ2/df=2.18,TLI=0.96,CFI=0.97,SRMR=0.04,RMSEA=0.07);GARS总分与SIAS、BFNE、状态焦虑、特质焦虑、CES-D、CBF-PI-B的神经质得分均呈正相关(ICC=0.67、0.32、0.42、0.39、0.33、0.34,均P<0.001)。总量表的Cronbach α系数为0.91,2周后重测信度为0.76。结论:本研究显示,注视焦虑评定量表(GARS)中文版测评中国大学生样本的信效度指标合格。

Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of Gaze Anxiety Rating Scale in Chinese undergraduates

Objective:To examine the validity and reliability of the Gaze Anxiety Rating Scale(GARS) in Chinese undergraduates.Methods:Totally 608 students were recruited in the study,among whom 352 were used for item analysis,exploratory factor analysis and validity analysis,229 for further confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency reliability analysis,and 27 were retested after a two-week interval for test-retest reliability analysis.Social Interaction Anxiety Scale(SIAS),Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation(BFNE),State-Trait Anxiety Inventory(STAI),Center of Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale(CES-D),Chinese Big Five Personality Inventory brief version(CBF-PI-B) were chosen as the criterion-related indication.Results:The exploratory factor analysis produced 3 factors including dominance situation,public speaking situation and daily life situation.The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that GARS had acceptable construct validity(χ~2/df=2.18,TLI=0.96,CFI=0.97,SRMR=0.04,RMSEA=0.07).The GARS scores were positively correlated with the scores of SIAS,BFNE,State Anxiety,Trait Anxiety,CES-D and CBF-PI-B(ICC=0.67,0.32,0.42,0.39,0.33 and 0.34,Ps<0.001).The Cronbach’s α coefficient of GARS was 0.91,the test-retest reliability after two weeks was 0.76.Conclusion:The revised Chinese Version of the Gaze Anxiety Rating Scale has good reliability and validity in Chinese undergraduates.