Comparison of Standard Suture vs Barbed Suture for Closing the Porcine Knee Joint: Evaluation of Biomechanical Integrity and Permeability

Background

This study aimed to compare the biomechanical strength and permeability of barbed vs traditional suture for closure of the porcine knee joint.

Methods

This study used Duroc pig knee joints. For each specimen, a 5-cm medial parapatellar arthrotomy was performed with the knee at 30° of flexion. We closed the arthrotomy wound using barbed suture (size 1/0 V-Loc 180) or traditional suture (size 1/0 PDS II). Specimens were divided into a PDS II (n = 9) and a V-Loc group (n = 9) for biomechanical testing, and a PDS II (n = 9) and a V-Loc group (n = 9) for permeability testing. In biomechanical testing, a continuous load was applied and the wound was pulled apart at 50 mm/min. We compared the maximum load under which each suture type could maintain wound closure. In permeability testing, the knee joints were flexed and extended for 200 cycles at 0.5 Hz from 0° to 120° of flexion. A tube was fixed in the articular cavity of the specimen and connected to a 1.5-m high water capsule. The time taken to wound effusion was compared.

Results

There was no significant difference between the mean load at initial failure for PDS II (424 ± 192 N) vs V-Loc (471 ± 100 N, P = .529), or between the mean time until effusion for PDS II (6.8 ± 3.4 seconds) vs V-Loc (5.5 ± 2.5 seconds, P = .390).

Conclusion

Standard and barbed suture had similar wound holding strength and permeability. The barbed suture was as stable as traditional suture.