首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

金属对金属全髋关节表面置换术的近期疗效
引用本文:何志勇,狄正林,曾智敏,陶崑,凌晶,章军辉,冯建翔.金属对金属全髋关节表面置换术的近期疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,2012,32(6):533-538.
作者姓名:何志勇  狄正林  曾智敏  陶崑  凌晶  章军辉  冯建翔
作者单位:315040,浙江省宁波市第六医院关节外科
摘    要: 目的 分析金属对金属全髋关节表面置换术的近期疗效, 探讨其适应证选择和技术要点。方法 2006 年1 月至2010 年10 月因股骨头坏死、髋关节骨关节炎、髋关节发育不良、强直性脊柱炎接受全髋关节表面置换术104 例(116 髋), 其中男59 例(66 髋), 女45 例(50 髋);年龄16~67 岁, 平均39.7 岁。均采用Conserve Plus 假体, 依据比利时技术标准完成全髋关节表面置换术。术后1 个月、3个月、6 个月、1 年及之后每年随访一次, 摄X 线片并统计Harris 髋关节评分。结果 101 例(112 髋)获得随访, 随访率97.1豫。随访时间9~66 个月, 平均33个月。Harris髋关节评分由术前平均(37.6±6.3)分提高至末次随访时(91.3±5.3)分, 其中优104 髋、良7 髋、差1 髋, 优良率99.1%(111/112)。末次随访时, 髋臼假体外展角36°~55°, 平均42.7°;股骨假体柄干角132°~146°, 平均138.5°。随访期间出现异位骨化2 例(2.0豫, 2/101), 分别为Brooker III型1 例及Brooker II型1 例, 均无症状, 未予处理。术后并发假体脱位1 例(1.0%, 1/101), 经手法复位及卧床1 个月治愈, 未再发生脱位。无股骨颈骨折、假体松动、感染及翻修病例。结论 严格选择手术适应证, 配合精确的手术技术, 金属对金属髋关节表面置换术可获得良好的近期疗效。

关 键 词:关节成形术    置换      假体设计  治疗结果
收稿时间:2011-06-09;

Preliminary results after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty
HE Zhi-yong , DI Zheng-lin , ZENG Zhi-min , TAO Kun , LING Jing , ZHANG Jun-hui , FENG Jian-xiang.Preliminary results after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty[J].Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics,2012,32(6):533-538.
Authors:HE Zhi-yong  DI Zheng-lin  ZENG Zhi-min  TAO Kun  LING Jing  ZHANG Jun-hui  FENG Jian-xiang
Institution:Department of Joint Surgery, Ningbo 6th Hospital, Ningbo 315040, China
Abstract:Objective To introduce the technique of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty, evaluate its preliminary clinical Results and review the factors which affect the Results. Methods From January 2006 to October 2010, 104 patients (116 hips) with osteonecrosis of the femoral head, hip osteoarthritis, hip dyplasia, or ankylosing spondylitis were treated with the total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Among them, 59 patients (66 hips) were male, and 45 patients (50 hips) were female, with an average age of 39.7 years (range, 16-67 years). Standard operation technique was performed for all patients with Conserve Plus prosthesis. Each patient was followed up at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year postoperatively. Results Three patients (4 hips) were lost, so 101 patients (112 hips) were followed up for an average period of 33 months (range, 9-66 months). The average Harris hip score was improved significantly from 37.6±6.3 preoperatively to 91.3±5.3 at final follow-up; 104 hips were excellent, 7 hips were good, 1 hip was poor, and the excellent and good rate was 99.1%. At final follow-up, the average abduction angle of the acetabular cup was 42.7° (range, 36°-55°); the average femoral prothesis stem-shaft angle was 138.5°(range, 132°-146°). Two patients presented with heterotopic ossification (Brook IIIand Brook II). One patient presented with prothesis dislocation, which healed after being treated with manual reduction. There was no femoral neck fracture, infection, or prosthesis loosening. Conclusion With strict patient selection criteria and optimized technique, the short-term Results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty are satisfactory.
Keywords:Arthroplasty  replacement  hip  Prosthesis design  Teatment outcome
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华骨科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华骨科杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号