Safety and learning curve in robotic colorectal surgery

Robotic surgery has recently started to be used for minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Because of limited access and high cost, very few colorectal units are available in the US. We describe our experience with benign and malignant disease since September 2008 in a dedicated colorectal practice. A prospective collected robotic database was queried for colon and rectal procedures. Anonymized demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data, and pathology information, were collected and analyzed. A total of 48 robotic procedures for colorectal maladies were performed in the study period. There were 35 females and 13 males. The average age was 57 years. Twenty-two cases were performed for diverticulitis, 13 for malignancy (10 distal rectum (<8 cm anal verge), two rectosigmoid, and one ascending colon cancer), 10 for rectal prolapse, two for rectovaginal fistula, and one for incidental appendiceal mucocele found during a gynecologic resection. The average operating room time (OR) was 162 min and there were no conversions to open procedures. Blood loss averaged 104 mL. Mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 5.4 days. Patient readmission occurred in 27.3% of cases. The anastamotic leak rate was 2.1% (one patient). No mortalities were reported. When the analysis was performed for colorectal malignancies (13 procedures), there were nine females and four males. Average age was 59 years. The mean OR time was 191.1 min. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 123 mL and there were no conversions to open surgery. Average LOS was 7.0 days. There was one anastamotic leak (7.7%). The length of stay was increased for the patient with anastamotic leak (18 days) and for a patient with high stoma output and postoperative ileus (17 days). Readmission rate was 30.1%. The total number of lymph nodes retrieved averaged 19.5, with a mean distal margin of 3.0 cm and in all cases negative radial margins. Robotic colorectal surgery for benign and malignant disease is safe, and short-term outcomes are comparable with those of traditional and laparoscopic surgery. Oncologic resections were adequate with excellent lymph node sampling and radial and distal margins.