Internal fixation of dorsally displaced fractures of the distal part of the radius. A biomechanical analysis of volar plate fracture stability

BACKGROUND: Volar plate fixation with use of either a locking plate or a neutralization plate has become increasingly popular among surgeons for the treatment of dorsally comminuted extra-articular distal radial fractures. The purpose of the present study was to compare the relative stability of five distal radial plates (four volar and one dorsal), all of which are commonly used for the treatment of dorsally comminuted extra-articular distal radial fractures, under loading conditions simulating the physiologic forces that are experienced during early active rehabilitation. METHODS: With use of a previously validated Sawbones fracture model, a dorsally comminuted extra-articular distal radial fracture was created. The fracture fixation stability of four volar plates (an AO T-plate, an AO 3.5-mm small-fragment plate, an AO 3.5-mm small-fragment locking plate, and the Hand Innovations DVR locking plate) were compared under axial compression loading and dorsal and volar bending simulating the in vivo stresses that are generated at the fracture site during early unopposed active motion of the wrist and digits. A single dorsal plate (an AO pi plate) was used for comparison, with and without simulated volar cortical comminution. The construct stiffness was measured to assess the resistance to fracture gap motion, and comparisons were made among the implants. RESULTS: The volar AO locking and DVR plates had greater resistance to fracture gap motion (greater stiffness) compared with the volar AO nonlocking and AO T-plates under axial and dorsal loading conditions (p < 0.01), with no significant difference between the AO volar locking and DVR plates. The volar AO locking plate had greater resistance to fracture gap motion than did the volar AO nonlocking plate under axial loading and dorsal bending forces (p < 0.01). The dorsal pi plate had the greatest resistance to fracture gap motion under axial loading and volar and dorsal bending forces (p < 0.01). However, the pi plate was significantly less stable to axial load and dorsal bending forces when the volar cortex was comminuted (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this model of dorsally comminuted extra-articular distal radial fractures, dorsal pi-plate fixation demonstrated better resistance to fracture gap motion than did the four types of volar plate fixation. The AO volar locking and DVR plates conferred the greatest resistance to fracture gap motion among the four volar plates tested. Volar locking technology conferred a significant increase in resistance to fracture gap motion as compared with nonlocking plate technology.