Dynamic assessment of pelvic floor function in women using the intravaginal device test

The aim of the study was to assess pelvic floor function and dysfunction using intravaginal devices (IVD test). One hundred and eighty-five patients were evaluated, 65 (35.1%) in the control group without genital prolapse and 120 (64.9%) in the study group, with prolapse. Anatomic changes were evaluated on a scale described by Halban, and functional classification based on palpation of the muscles of the pelvic floor during contraction. Additionally, weighted vaginal devices were used to assess pelvic floor function. Statistic analysis was performed with the Spearman-Pearson correlation coefficient, the ² test and the response/ operator characteristic curve. There was an acceptable correlation between the IVD test and the functional classification of 0.75. Using this classification, the IVD test showed 86.58% sensitivity, 75.72% specificity, and had a positive predictive value 73.95% and a negative predictive value of 87.64%. Significant differences between pelvic floor muscle activity in those patients with and without genital prolapse were observed (X²=58.28, P=<0.005). It was concluded that pelvic floor assessment can be done through the evaluation of active muscle strength or pelvic floor integrity using the functional classification and the IVD test.EDITORIAL COMMENT: In 1988, Peattie and Plevnick introduced the use of weighted vaginal cones to exercise the pelvic floor muscles and treat stress urinary incontinence 1]. Contreras-Ortiz and Nuñez build on this earlier work, using a similar technique to assess pelvic floor muscle function and integrity. Specifically, pelvic floor function is assessed by a combination of digital palpation of the pubococcygeus muscle at rest and during contraction; pelvic floor integrity is assessed by the patient's ability to retain a weighted cone vaginally for 1 minute. Scoring of these two parameters can then be objectively followed for therapeutic response to treatment for urinary incontinence or pelvic relaxation. Many of us forget to palpate the pubococcygeus muscle at rest and during an elicited contraction during baseline or follow-up examination. As this study indicates, simple assessment of pelvic floor function and integrity is possible, and should be used both clinically and in research.