首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

不同后交叉韧带指数测量方法对前交叉韧带损伤的诊断价值
引用本文:杨俊,滕元君,王遵林,刘众成,陈思捷,伍雪平,牛永康,夏亚一.不同后交叉韧带指数测量方法对前交叉韧带损伤的诊断价值[J].中国骨伤,2023,36(10):926-931.
作者姓名:杨俊  滕元君  王遵林  刘众成  陈思捷  伍雪平  牛永康  夏亚一
作者单位:兰州大学第二临床医学院, 甘肃 兰州 730030;兰州大学第二临床医学院, 甘肃 兰州 730030;兰州大学第二医院骨科, 甘肃 兰州 730030;哈尔滨医科大学, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150000
基金项目:兰州市科技发展计划项目(编号:2021-1-106);兰州大学第二医院萃英学子科研培育计划项目(编号:CYXZ2021-17/CYXZ2021-25);兰州大学国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目(编号:202210730182);兰州大学医学教育创新发展项目(编号:lzugxcx-2022-97/lzugxlx-2022-173)
摘    要:目的:比较6种不同测量方法下的后交叉韧带(posterior cruciate ligament,PCL)指数(Index),分析验证其在前交叉韧带(anterior cruciate ligament,ACL)损伤中的临床诊断价值。方法:回顾性分析2018年5月至2022年3月收治的225例患者的膝关节MRI资料,年龄18~60岁,中位数32岁。根据ACL是否损伤,分为ACL正常组和ACL损伤组。在114例ACL损伤和111例ACL完整受试者的膝关节MRI矢状位图像上,测量MRI矢状位PCL在股骨附着点和胫骨附着点之间的直线距离(A)和该直线到矢状位图像上PCL弧形标记点之间的最大垂直距离(B),计算PCL Index并评估其对ACL损伤的诊断价值。结果:ACL正常组和ACL损伤组PCL Index1、2、3、6比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组PCL Index4、5比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。ACL正常组的PCL Index2、6与患者年龄呈负相关性(相关系数=-0.213,-0.189;P<0.05),ACL损伤组的PCL Index5与...

关 键 词:前交叉韧带损伤  后交叉韧带指数  诊断价值  敏感性
收稿时间:2022/12/7 0:00:00

Study on the diagnostic value of different posterior cruciate ligament index measurement methods for anterior cruciate ligament injury
YANG Jun,TENG Yuan-jun,WANG Zun-lin,LIU Zhong-cheng,CHEN Si-jie,WU Xue-ping,NIU Yong-kang,XIA Ya-yi.Study on the diagnostic value of different posterior cruciate ligament index measurement methods for anterior cruciate ligament injury[J].China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology,2023,36(10):926-931.
Authors:YANG Jun  TENG Yuan-jun  WANG Zun-lin  LIU Zhong-cheng  CHEN Si-jie  WU Xue-ping  NIU Yong-kang  XIA Ya-yi
Institution:The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou Universty, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu, China;The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou Universty, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu, China;Department of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu, China;Harbin Medical University, Harbin 15000, Heilongjiang, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the posterior cruciate ligament(PCL) index with six different measurement methods,and analyze and verify its clinical diagnostic value in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Methods The Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of 225 knee joints in our hospital from May 2018 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed,aged from 18 to 60 years old,with a median of 32 years old. On the sagittal MRI images of 114 patients with ACL injury and 111 patients with intact ACL,Measure the straight-line distance (A) between the femoral attachment point and the tibial attachment point of the PCL on the MRI sagittal image and the maximum vertical distance (B) between the straight line and the arcuate mark point of the PCL on the sagittal image,calculate the PCL index and evaluate the diagnostic value of the PCL index for ACL injury. Results The PCL index of the ACL normal group and the ACL injury group were statistically described. There was no significant difference in PCL index 1,2,3 and 6 between the two groups(P>0.05). The difference of PCL index 4 and 5 between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.001). This study only found that the PCL index 2,6 in the ACL normal group had a negative correlation with the patient''s age (correlation coefficient=-0.213,-0.819;P<0.05),and the PCL index 5 in the ACL injury group was significantly correlated with the patient''s body mass index(BMI)had a negative correlation (correlation coefficient=-0.277,P<0.05). Conclusion The change of PCL index is helpful for the diagnosis of ACL injury,PCL index 4 and 5 can be used as effective reference indexes for diagnosing ACL injury in clinic.
Keywords:Anterior cruciate ligament injury  Posterior cruciate ligament index  Diagnostic value  Sensitivity
点击此处可从《中国骨伤》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国骨伤》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号