| Abstract: | Associations of abnormal spermatozoa with bull fertility have yielded varying results. Manual methods of analysis are subjective and highly variable within and between technicians, which may account for these differences. Computer-aided sperm head morphometry appears to be a precise method of assessing sperm head dimensions; however, the effects of replication and technician on sperm head morphometry have not been assessed. The objective of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-analysis and technician variation associated with computer-aided bull sperm head morphometry analysis. Semen from 10 bulls was diluted to 200 x 10(6) sperm/mL, and slide smears were prepared and stained using haematoxylin and rose bengal. Each of two technicians analysed 250 images from each slide, 3 times, using computer-aided sperm head morphometry analysis. The morphometric dimensions of area, perimeter, length, width and width/length for individual sperm heads of each analysis were assessed by GLM-ANOVA for effects of bulls, replications and technicians. The coefficient of variation was recorded for each analysis and across replications. The mean coefficients of variation within and between analyses were compared between technicians by GLM-ANOVA. No differences (p > 0.1) between technicians were found between or among bulls for area (29.63 vs. 29.26 micron 2), perimeter (23.73 vs. 23.86 microns), length (8.73 vs. 8.71 microns), width (4.47 vs. 4.46 microns), or width/length (0.51 vs. 0.51). No differences (p > 0.1) between replicates for sperm head dimension were detected within or among bulls for either technician. No intra- or inter-analysis differences (p > 0.1) between technicians on CVs were observed. The mean intra-analysis CVs for all bulls for both technicians were area = 6.9%, perimeter = 4.9%, length = 4.5%, width = 5.6% and width/length = 6.5%. The mean interanalysis CVs for both technicians were area = 3.0%, perimeter = 2.4%, length = 2.0%, width = 2.0%, and width/length = 1.7%. The results indicate that ASMA is a repeatable and objective method of assessing bull sperm head morphometry within and between technicians. No differences between replications were detected, and hence replicate analyses are not necessary to acquire accurate morphometric data. |
