首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison of the Quality of Patient Referrals From Physicians,Physician Assistants,and Nurse Practitioners
Authors:Robert H. Lohr  Colin P. West  Margaret Beliveau  Paul R. Daniels  Mark A. Nyman  William C. Mundell  Nina M. Schwenk  Jayawant N. Mandrekar  James M. Naessens  Thomas J. Beckman
Affiliation:1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN;2. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN;3. Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the quality of referrals of patients with complex medical problems from nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), and physicians to general internists.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective comparison study involving regional referrals to an academic medical center from January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2010. All 160 patients referred by NPs and PAs combined and a random sample of 160 patients referred by physicians were studied. Five experienced physicians blinded to the source of referral used a 7-item instrument to assess the quality of referrals. Internal consistency, interrater reliability, and dimensionality of item scores were determined. Differences between item scores for patients referred by physicians and those for patients referred by NPs and PAs combined were analyzed by using multivariate ordinal logistical regression adjusted for patient age, sex, distance of the referral source from Mayo Clinic, and Charlson Index.ResultsFactor analysis revealed a 1-dimensional measure of the quality of patient referrals. Interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient for individual items: range, 0.77-0.93; overall, 0.92) and internal consistency for items combined (Cronbach α=0.75) were excellent. Referrals from physicians were scored higher (percentage of agree/strongly agree responses) than were referrals from NPs and PAs for each of the following items: referral question clearly articulated (86.3% vs 76.0%; P=.0007), clinical information provided (72.6% vs 54.1%; P=.003), documented understanding of the patient's pathophysiology (51.0% vs 30.3%; P<.0001), appropriate evaluation performed locally (60.3% vs 39.0%; P<.0001), appropriate management performed locally (53.5% vs 24.1%; P<.0001), and confidence returning patient to referring health care professional (67.8% vs 41.4%; P<.0001). Referrals from physicians were also less likely to be evaluated as having been unnecessary (30.1% vs 56.2%; P<.0001).ConclusionThe quality of referrals to an academic medical center was higher for physicians than for NPs and PAs regarding the clarity of the referral question, understanding of pathophysiology, and adequate prereferral evaluation and documentation.
Keywords:NP"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0015"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  nurse practitioner  PA"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0025"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  physician assistant
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号