Horizontal equity and efficiency at primary health care facilities in rural Afghanistan: A seemingly unrelated regression approach |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Health Systems Program, USA;2. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, USA;1. Department of Physics, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden;2. Department of Physics, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden;1. Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK;2. British Society of Neuroradiologists, UK;3. Department of Neuroradiology, Queen''s Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK;4. UK Neurointerventional Group, UK;5. Stroke Medicine, Guys and St Thomas Hospital, London, UK;6. British Association of Stroke Physicians, UK;7. Stroke Medicine, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK;8. Department of Anaesthesia, St George''s Hospital, London, UK;9. Neuro Anaesthesia & Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, UK;10. Neuroradiology Department, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, UK;1. Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, Indonesia;2. Nursing Academy RS Husada, Jakarta, Indonesia |
| |
| Abstract: | Producing services efficiently and equitably are important goals for health systems. Many countries pursue horizontal equity – providing people with the same illnesses equal access to health services – by locating facilities in remote areas. Staff are often paid incentives to work at such facilities. However, there is little evidence on how many fewer people are treated at remote facilities than facilities in more densely settled areas. This research explores if there is an association between the efficiency of health centers in Afghanistan and the remoteness of their location.Survey teams collected data on facility level inputs and outputs at a stratified random sample of 579 health centers in 2005. Quality of care was measured by observing staff interact with patients and determining if staff completed a set of normative patient care tasks. We used seemingly unrelated regression to determine if facilities in remote areas have fewer outpatient visits than other rural facilities. In this analysis, one equation compares the number of outpatient visits to facility inputs, while another compares quality of care to determinants of quality.The results indicate remote facilities have about 13% fewer outpatient visits than non-remote facilities, holding inputs constant. Our analysis suggests that facilities in remote areas are realizing horizontal equity since their clients are receiving comparable quality of care to those at non-remote facilities. However, we find the average labor cost for a visit at a remote facility is $1.44, but only $0.97 at other rural facilities, indicating that a visit in a remote facility would have to be ‘worth’ 1.49 times a visit at a rural facility for there to be no equity – efficiency trade-off. In determining where to build or staff health centers, this loss of efficiency may be offset by progress toward a social policy objective of providing services to disadvantaged rural populations. |
| |
| Keywords: | Afghanistan Equity Efficiency Seemingly unrelated regression Primary health care |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
