The use of chemical occurrence data at European vs. national level in dietary exposure assessments: A methodological study |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Dietary and Chemical Monitoring Unit, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy;2. Risk-Benefit Assessment Department, National Food Agency, Uppsala, Sweden;1. Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, E-30100 Murcia, Spain;2. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Regional “Campus Mare Nostrum”, Spain;3. Servicio de Pesca y Acuicultura, D.G. de Ganadería y Pesca, Consejería de Agricultura y Agua de la Región de Murcia, Juan XXIII, 30071 Murcia, Spain;4. Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. Puerta de Hierro s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain;1. DABMEB Consultancy Ltd, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire, UK;2. B-Safe Toxicology Consulting, Rushden, Northamptonshire, UK;1. Basque Centre for Climate Change (BC3), 48940 Leioa, Spain;2. UMR CNRS 5805 EPOC, Université de Bordeaux, 33615 Pessac, France;3. Otago Museum, 419 Great King Street, PO Box 6202, Dunedin 9059, New Zealand;4. DigitalGlobe, Inc., 2325 Dulles Corner Blvd, Suite 1000, Herndon, VA 20171, USA;5. University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, I.U. EcoAqua, Campus U. de Tafira, Edificio de Ciencias Básicas, Fac. Ciencias del Mar, sn., 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain |
| |
Abstract: | A typical EFSA approach to assess dietary exposure is to combine data from national consumption surveys with chemical occurrence data that have been pooled across the EU Member States (pooled approach). This approach was compared to the case where occurrence data were stratified by country and used for food categories where national data were abundant (semi-pooled approach), using cadmium as a case study. Some differences in estimated dietary exposure were observed between the pooled and semi-pooled approach. They were explained by differences, between the national and the European occurrence data, with respect to (1) contamination values and (2) sample proportions of food items classified in the food categories the assessment was based on. The latter aspect highlighted the sensitivity of the approach of directly aggregating monitoring data into food categories. Both the pooled and semi-pooled approach tended to be conservative relative to approaches used at national level. This appears to be attributed to differences in the way the available occurrence data is aggregated. Refinement of the studied methodologies would include a better separation of the food items with high concentration from those with low concentration. |
| |
Keywords: | Dietary exposure Contamination Consumption survey Cadmium |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|