首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Impact of HPV testing in opportunistic cervical screening: Support for primary HPV screening in the United States
Authors:Jack Cuzick  Rachael Adcock  Walter Kinney  Philip E Castle  Michael Robertson  Ruth M McDonald  Mark H Stoler  Ruofei Du  Cosette M Wheeler  for the New Mexico HPV Pap Registry Steering Committee
Institution:1. Centre for Prevention, Diagnosis and Detection, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK;2. Emeritus, Sacramento, California, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Supervision (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal);3. Division of Cancer Prevention and Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal);4. Center for HPV Prevention, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

Contribution: Data curation (equal), Methodology (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal);5. Department of Pathology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal);6. Center for HPV Prevention, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

Contribution: Data curation (equal), Writing - review & editing (equal);7. Center for HPV Prevention, UNM Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

Abstract:Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for cervical screening increases diagnosis of precancer and reduces the incidence of cervical cancer more than cytology alone. However, real-world evidence from diverse practice settings is lacking for the United States (U.S.) to support clinician adoption of primary HPV screening. Using a population-based registry, which captures all cervical cytology (with or without HPV testing) and all cervical biopsies, we conducted a real-world evidence study of screening in women aged 30 to 64 years across the entire state of New Mexico. Negative cytology was used to distinguish cotests from reflex HPV tests. A total of 264 198 cervical screening tests (with exclusions based on clinical history) were recorded as the first screening test between 2014 and 2017. Diagnoses of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 or 3 or greater (CIN2+, CIN3+) from 2014 to 2019 were the main outcomes. Of cytology-negative screens, 165 595 (67.1%) were cotests and 4.8% of these led to biopsy within 2 years vs 3.2% in the cytology-only group. Among cytology-negative, HPV tested women, 347 of 398 (87.2%) CIN2+ cases were diagnosed in HPV-positive women, as were 147 of 164 (89.6%) CIN3+ cases. Only 29/921 (3.2%) CIN3+ and 67/1964 (3.4%) CIN2+ cases were diagnosed in HPV-negative, cytology-positive women with biopsies. Under U.S. opportunistic screening, across a diversity of health care delivery practices, and in a population suffering multiple disparities, we show adding HPV testing to cytology substantially increased the yield of CIN2+ and CIN3+. CIN3+ was rarely diagnosed in HPV-negative women with abnormal cytology, supporting U.S. primary HPV-only screening.
Keywords:cervical cancer prevention  cervical cancer screening  cotesting vs cytology  opportunistic cervical screening  primary HPV screening
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号