Acute peripheral arterial ischemia: A prospective evaluation of differential management with surgery or thrombolysis |
| |
Authors: | Jonothan J. Earnshaw MD FRCS Roger H. S. Gregson FRCR Geoffrey S. Makin FRCS Brian R. Hopkinson FRCS |
| |
Affiliation: | Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, England. |
| |
Abstract: | In this three year prospective study of 177 patients with acute peripheral arterial ischemia those subjects with acute iliofemoral emboli or ischemia with a neurosensory deficit had urgent operations. The remainder included patients less likely to have limb salvage after surgery and who therefore were treated with thrombolytic therapy. This was done in three open studies of intravenous, acylated, plasminogen-streptokinase activator complex, low dose intraarterial streptokinase and intraarterial tissue-plasminogen activator (t-PA). The overall outcome after 30 days of thrombolytic therapy was limb salvage (55%), amputation (15%), and death (30%). The severity of the presenting ischemia was the most important prognostic indicator. In patients with a neurosensory deficit, limb salvage after either embolectomy or surgical reconstruction (59%) was more likely than after thrombolysis (31%). In patients without a neurosensory deficit, limb salvage after thrombolysis (68%) was better, though not significantly, than after surgery (53%). Local intraarterial thrombolysis with either streptokinase or t-PA produced an encouraging 66% limb salvage in 59 cases. In management of acute peripheral arterial occlusions an approach based on the severity of ischemia is optimal, with urgent surgery for patients with a neurosensory deficit and intraarterial thrombolytic therapy reserved as an alternative in selected cases with stable ischemia. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|