首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Filter run time in CVVH: pre- versus post-dilution and nadroparin versus regional heparin-protamine anticoagulation
Authors:van der Voort P H J  Gerritsen R T  Kuiper M A  Egbers P H M  Kingma W P  Boerma E C
Affiliation:Department of Intensive Care, Medical Centre Leeuwarden, NR-8901 BR Leeuwarden, The Netherlands. phjvdvoort@chello.nl
Abstract:BACKGROUND/AIMS: To study the effect of different modes of continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH) on filter run time (FRT). METHODS: We studied, in two consecutive prospective, randomised and crossover studies, 16 and 15 patients with acute renal failure during critical illness. Study A compared pre- versus post-dilution, and study B compared regional anticoagulation with heparin (pre-filter) and protamine (post-filter) (HP) versus nadroparin (NP) pre-filter. All CVVH sessions were standardised. Analyses were by Wilcoxon rank sum tests. RESULTS: Study A: During pre-dilution the median FRT was 45.7 vs. 16.1 h in post-dilution CVVH (p = 0.005). The median creatinine clearance during pre-dilution was 33 vs. 45 ml/min in post-dilution (p = 0.001). Study B: During NP, median FRT was 39.5 vs. 12.3 h during HP CVVH (p = 0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-dilution CVVH results in the greatest FRT but a lower plasma creatinine clearance compared to post-dilution. Regional anticoagulation with heparin-protamine resulted in a significantly shorter FRT compared to systemic NP anticoagulation.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号