| Abstract: | In order to achieve more understanding of the diagnosis of borderline personality, particularly as it relates to DSM-III, a historical review of influential diagnostic approaches is undertaken. DSM-III defines the borderline personality disorder in a simple way, enhancing reliability and research value. In comparison to other influential approaches, however, there is an overemphasis on affective disturbance, plus an obvious omission amongst the diagnostic criteria of the vulnerability to brief psychotic regressions under stress. The checklist approach of DSM-III greatly takes away from dynamic understanding and makes potentially valuable items such as defensive organization difficult to include. The DSM-III concept of the borderline personality as one of many distinct personality disorders seems unfounded. The concept of the borderline as a superordinate diagnosis under which more specific personality disorders would fall, appears more reasonable. |
