首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

残留内翻对弓形股骨患者全膝关节置换术后功能恢复的影响
引用本文:张龙,李辉,马建兵,卿忠,潘文杰,赵光辉,黄小强.残留内翻对弓形股骨患者全膝关节置换术后功能恢复的影响[J].实用骨科杂志,2020(4):304-308.
作者姓名:张龙  李辉  马建兵  卿忠  潘文杰  赵光辉  黄小强
作者单位:西安医学院;西安交通大学医学院附属红会医院膝关节外科
摘    要:目的探究残留内翻的下肢力线对弓形股骨患者行全膝关节置换术(total knee arthroplasty,TKA)术后功能恢复的影响。方法本研究回顾性收集西安市红会医院膝关节外科2015年1月至2015年12月,接受同一术者实施TKA的59例(71膝)骨关节炎患者的全部资料,其中男6例(8膝),女53例(63膝);年龄58~82岁,平均(67.7±5.7)岁。测量患者股骨侧弓角(femoral bowing angle,FBA)及下肢力线(hip-knee-ankle angle,HKA)。FBA<177°定义为弓形股骨。根据术后负重位标准正位X线片将患者分为两组:残留内翻组32例37膝(HKA<177°),中立位力线组27例34膝HKA为(180±3)°]。以美国膝关节协会评分(knee society score,KSS)及西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数评分(the western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index,WOMAC)评价两组术后功能及症状。结果患者均获随访,随访时间43~55个月,平均随访时间为(49.30±4.11)个月。全部患者均未见假体松动、感染等严重并发症。两组患者术前KSS及WOMAC评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P<0.05);手术前后比较差异有统计学意义(P>0.05);术后残留内翻组WOMAC总分(5.57±6.23)分]较中立位力线组(9.27±8.86)分]明显降低,WOMAC C部分(日常生活困难程度)评分(4.95±5.87)分]显著低于中立位力线组(8.24±7.68)分],余各评分比较差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相比中立位力线,存在弓形股骨的患者行TKA术后下肢力线残留内翻可以获得更好的临床结局,但中远期疗效有待进一步观察。

关 键 词:弓形股骨  下肢力线  全膝关节置换术

Effect of Remaining Mild Varus on Clinical Outcome after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Lateral Femoral Bowing
Institution:(Xi'an Medical University,Xi'an 710021,China;Department of Joint Surgery,Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Xi'an,Xi'an 710054,China)
Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of remaining mild varus on postoperative functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty(TKA)in patients with femoral bowing.Methods A retrospective review of aprospectively maintained data base were performed.We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients(71 knees)of undergoing TKA by the same surgeon,including 6 cases(8 knees)of males and 53 cases(63 knees)of females,from January of 2015 to December of 2015.Mean age of patients was(67.7±5.7)(range 58~82).Femoral bowing Angle and hip-knee-ankle Anglewere measured.FBA<177°was defined as the femoral bowing.Patients were divided into two groups according to the postoperative HKA angle from weight-bearing full-leg radiographs:varus malalignment group with 32 patients(37 knees),HKA<177°;neutral alignment groupwith 27 patients(34 knees),HKA was(180±3)°.The Knee Society Score(KSS)and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index(WOMAC)were compared between preoperative and postoperative.Results Mean of follow-up was(49.30±4.11)months(range,43~55 months).No revisions occurred in any of the groups at midtermfollow-up.There were no statistical difference in preoperative KSS and WOMAC scores.All patients improved between preoperative and post-operative timepoints(P<0.05).The WOMAC total score of varus malalignment group(5.57±6.23)were significantly lower than that in the neutral alignment group(9.27±8.86);the WOMACpart C score of varus malalignment group(4.95±5.87)were significantly lower than that in the neutral alignment group(8.24±7.68).There was no significant difference in the remaining scores(P<0.05).Conclusion For patients with lateral femoral bowing,residual varus alignment leads to better clinical outcomes after TKA than neutral alignment at a mean follow-up of 49.3 months.However,The effect of residual varus alignment on the survivalship of the prosthesis and the long-term outcome needs to be further evaluated.
Keywords:femoral bowing  alignment of lower limb  total knee arthroplasty
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号