Efficacy and Safety of Maribavir Dosed at 100 mg Orally Twice Daily for the Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Liver Transplant Recipients: A Randomized,Double‐Blind,Multicenter Controlled Trial |
| |
Authors: | D. J. Winston F. Saliba E. Blumberg M. Abouljoud J. B. Garcia‐Diaz J. A. Goss L. Clough R. Avery A. P. Limaye B. G. Ericzon M. Navasa R. I. Troisi H. Chen S. A. Villano M. E. Uknis for the – Clinical Study Group |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Hospital Paul Brousse, Villejuif Cedex, France;2. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA;3. Henry Ford Transplant Institute, Detroit, MI;4. Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA;5. Baylor Collge of Medicine, Houston, TX;6. University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS;7. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH;8. University of Washington, Seattle, WA;9. Karolínska Univers?tetssjukhúset‐Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden;10. Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;11. UZ Gent, Gent, Belgium;12. ViroPharma, Inc., Exton, PA;13. ?The Maribavir 1263‐301 Clinical Study Group is listed in the Acknowledgement Section. |
| |
Abstract: | Maribavir is an oral benzimidazole riboside with potent in vitro activity against cytomegalovirus (CMV), including some CMV strains resistant to ganciclovir. In a randomized, double‐blind, multicenter trial, the efficacy and safety of prophylactic oral maribavir (100 mg twice daily) for prevention of CMV disease were compared with oral ganciclovir (1000 mg three times daily) in 303 CMV‐seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV‐seropositive donors (147 maribavir; 156 ganciclovir). Patients received study drug for up to 14 weeks and were monitored for CMV infection by blood surveillance tests and also for the development of CMV disease. The primary endpoint was Endpoint Committee (EC)‐confirmed CMV disease within 6 months of transplantation. In a modified intent‐to‐treat analysis, the noninferiority of maribavir compared to oral ganciclovir for prevention of CMV disease was not established (12% with maribavir vs. 8% with ganciclovir: event rate difference of 0.041; 95% CI: ?0.038, 0.119). Furthermore, significantly fewer ganciclovir patients had EC‐confirmed CMV disease or CMV infection by pp65 antigenemia or CMV DNA PCR compared to maribavir patients at both 100 days (20% vs. 60%; p < 0.0001) and at 6 months (53% vs. 72%; p = 0.0053) after transplantation. Graft rejection, patient survival, and non‐CMV infections were similar for maribavir and ganciclovir patients. Maribavir was well‐tolerated and associated with fewer hematological adverse events than oral ganciclovir. At a dose of 100 mg twice daily, maribavir is safe but not adequate for prevention of CMV disease in liver transplant recipients at high risk for CMV disease. |
| |
Keywords: | Cytomegalovirus liver transplantation Maribavir prevention |
|
|