首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

新鲜血小板输注和深低温保存血小板输注的疗效比较
引用本文:陈江声,杨燕娇,翁锦文.新鲜血小板输注和深低温保存血小板输注的疗效比较[J].河北医学,2004,10(2):111-113.
作者姓名:陈江声  杨燕娇  翁锦文
作者单位:汕头大学医学院第二附属医院,广东,汕头,515041;汕头大学医学院第二附属医院,广东,汕头,515041;汕头大学医学院第二附属医院,广东,汕头,515041
摘    要:目的:比较用新鲜和深低温保存的浓缩血小板悬液治疗急性白血病化疗后血小板减少的疗效。方法:42例患者用新鲜浓缩血小板悬液输注,另外49例用深低温保存血小板输注。结果:输注新鲜血小板组共接受血小板输注79次,平均每例输注1.88次,CCI值有效率35.4%,临床疗效有效率88.09%;输注深低温保存血小板组共131次.平均每例2.67次,CCI值有效率16.79%,临床疗效有效率81.63%;两组间比较CCI值及输注次数差异有统计学意义,临床疗效比较无统计学意义。结论:输注新鲜血小板疗效优于输注深低温保存的血小板。

关 键 词:新鲜血小板  冰冻血小板  血小板输注    
文章编号:1006-6233(2004)02-0111-03

Compare the transfusion effect between fresh platelet and frozen platelet
CHEN Jiang-sheng,YANG Yan-jiao,WENG Jin-wen.Compare the transfusion effect between fresh platelet and frozen platelet[J].Hebei Medicine,2004,10(2):111-113.
Authors:CHEN Jiang-sheng  YANG Yan-jiao  WENG Jin-wen
Abstract:Objective:To compare with the effect of transfusion between fresh and frozen platelet in treating thromobocytopenia caused by postchemotherapeutic in patients with acute leukemia.Methods:42 patients were treated with fresh platelet and 49 patients treated with frozen platelet.Results:The group with the fresh platelet transfusion were received 79 times transfusions,each case was received 1.88 average times,the effective rate of the corrected count index (CCI) was 35.4%,the clinical effective rate was 88.9%;the group with the frozen platelet transfusion were received 131 times,each case was received 2.67 average times,the effective rate of CCI was 16.79%,the clinical effective rate was 81.63%.The differences of CCI and the times of platelet transfusion between two groups was significant (P<0.05); and the clinical effect was no difference (P>0.05).Conclusions:The effect of the fresh platelet transfusion is better than the frozen platelet transfusion.
Keywords:Fresh platelet  Frozen platelet  Platelet transfusion  Curative effect
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号