| 面制食品铝含量测定中不同消化方法的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李玉枝,马道瑞.面制食品铝含量测定中不同消化方法的比较[J].河南预防医学杂志,2009,20(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李玉枝 马道瑞 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 卫辉市卫生防疫站,河南,卫辉,453100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的找出面制食品中铝含量测定较优的样品消化方法。方法用硝酸-高氯酸和微波消解两种消化方法分别检测6份样品,对两种消化方法铝含量结果的变异系数及加标回收率进行比较分析。结果两种消化方法检测的结果的精密度差异无统计学意义(F=1.11P>0.05)两种消化方法检测结果的准确度差异无统计学意义(F=1.03P>0.05),微波消解法比硝酸-高氯酸消化方法用酸量少,省时。结论两种消化方法均可作为面制食品中铝含量测定的消化方法应用,微波消解比硝酸-高氯酸消化方法更加简便,更加易于操作。
|
| 关 键 词： | 铝 测定 消化方法 变异系数 加标回收率 |
Make food being unlike the comparison digesting method's in contents aluminium admeasurements face to face |
| |
| LI Yu-zhi,MA Dao-rui.Make food being unlike the comparison digesting method's in contents aluminium admeasurements face to face[J].Henan Journal of Preventive Medicine,2009,20(2). |
| |
| Authors: | LI Yu-zhi MA Dao-rui |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective Find out the content of aluminium in food samples to digest the optimum way.Method uses hydrogen nitrate-perchloric acid and microwave to dispel two kinds samples digesting method checking 6 share respectively,the comparison being in progress to the coefficient of recovery two kinds,digesting the contents method aluminium.Results Dissociation modulus and adding a bid analyses.difference that method checks two kinds there being no notable(F = 1.11,P> 0.05) two kinds digestions method detecting resu... |
| |
| Keywords: | aluminium Determining concentration Determining methods varying factor recovery rate |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
