剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择及围产儿结局

目的：研究分析剖宫产术后再次妊娠分娩方式的选择对新生儿结局的影响。方法：回顾性分析2010年6月-2011年12月期间本院收治的84例剖宫产术后再次妊娠孕妇的临床资料,按照患者选择的不同分娩方式将84例孕妇随机分为两组,阴道分娩组42例,剖宫产组42例。比较两组孕妇的分娩结局和新生儿结局。结果：治疗后阴道分娩组孕妇的产后不良症状发生情况明显低于剖宫产组,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,但是两组孕妇分娩后的新生儿结局比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论：剖宫产术后再次妊娠不是剖宫产手术的绝对指征,应对无产可手术指征的孕妇给予试产机会。

Pregnancy after Cesarean Section Delivery Mode Selection and Perinatal Outcomes

Objective：To study the effect of pregnancies after cesarean section selection on neonatal outcomes. Method：A retrospective analysis of 2010 June -2011 year in December,the clinical data of 84 cases of pregnant women with pregnancy after cesarean section in our hospital,according to the different modes of delivery were selected 84 pregnant women were randomly divided into two groups,42 cases of vaginal delivery,cesarean section 42 cases. Birth outcomes and neonatal outcomes were compared between the two groups of pregnant women. Result：After treatment,symptoms of pregnant women postpartum vaginal delivery group was significantly lower than the incidence of cesarean section group,the difference between the two groups was significant,with statistical significance（ P〈0.05）,but no significant difference was found between the two groups of pregnant women after delivery, neonatal outcome,no significant difference（ P〈0.05）.Conclusion：The absolute mean pregnancy after cesarean section is not a caesarean operation syndrome,with no property operation indications of pregnant women to produce an opportunity.