首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Evaluation of a smartphone nutrition and physical activity application to provide lifestyle advice to pregnant women: The SNAPP randomised trial
Authors:Jodie M. Dodd  Jennie Louise  Courtney Cramp  Rosalie M. Grivell  Lisa J. Moran  Andrea R. Deussen
Affiliation:1. Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;2. Department of Perinatal Medicine, Women's and Babies Division, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;3. School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;4. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Flinders Medical Centre and School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia;5. Monash Centre for Health Research Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Abstract:Our objective was to evaluate the impact of a smartphone application as an adjunct to face‐to‐face consultations in facilitating dietary and physical activity change among pregnant women. This multicentre, nested randomised trial involved pregnant women with a body mass index ≥18.5 kg/m2, with a singleton pregnancy between 10 and 20 weeks' gestation, and participating in 2 pregnancy nutrition‐based randomised trials across metropolitan Adelaide, South Australia. All women participating in the SNAPP trial received a comprehensive dietary, physical activity, and behavioural intervention, as part of the GRoW or OPTIMISE randomised trials. Women were subsequently randomised to either the “Lifestyle Advice Only Group,” where women received the above intervention, or the “Lifestyle Advice plus Smartphone Application Group,” where women were additionally provided access to the smartphone application. The primary outcome was healthy eating index (HEI) assessed by maternal food frequency questionnaire completed at trial entry, and 28 and 36 weeks' gestation. Analyses were performed using intention‐to‐treat principles, with statistical significance at p = .05. One hundred sixty‐two women participated: 77 allocated to the Lifestyle Advice plus Smartphone Application Group and 85 to the Lifestyle Advice Only Group. Mean difference in HEI score at 28 weeks of pregnancy was 0.01 (CI [?2.29, 2.62]) and at 36 weeks of pregnancy ?1.16 (CI [?4.60, 2.28]). There was no significant additional benefit from the provision of the smartphone application in improving HEI score (p = .452). Although all women improved dietary quality across pregnancy, use of the smartphone application was poor. Our findings do not support addition of the smartphone application.
Keywords:diet and physical activity intervention studies  dietary strategies  maternal obesity  nutrition education  pregnancy and nutrition  randomised controlled trial
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号